Why It's Time for Me to Quit Chess

Sort:
nklristic
Dmfed wrote:
mitchellr92 skrev:

I can't tell if you are a troll or not, but you are definitely entertaining.

Really, you can't? The user @TacticalPrecision (1280 isch) whose latest game diagram is for someone named @DigitalDestruction (1701) and yet he continue to talk as if it was his game, which it probably was because... "reasons". 

It is his. But it is on lichess. Their ratings are different.

PRodigyya

Homie is saying girls find him attractive when bro making a big deal about chess something he doesn't care about if that's true why you still on here complainin BUSY man.

rohithbala
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Dmfed wrote:
mitchellr92 skrev:

I can't tell if you are a troll or not, but you are definitely entertaining.

Really, you can't? The user @TacticalPrecision (1280 isch) whose latest game diagram is for someone named @DigitalDestruction (1701) and yet he continue to talk as if it was his game, which it probably was because... "reasons". 

More time spent on learning how to read and less time on Chess, my friend. One game was from Chess.com and the other was from Lichess. They're both my accounts. 

See what happens when you spend too much time worrying about a weak square or king safety? You start to lose at real life. 

 

I'm really sad why you can't see that nobody really cares. We all don't care really about what you're saying. You have your opinion. But we have ours.

SmallerCircles

I don't see anyone else complaining about having to mate their opponent to win. That's a you-problem. You're showing a massive lack of emotional maturity right now. Chess can be frustrating, but you're being ridiculous.

PlayByDay
nklristic skrev:

It is his. But it is on lichess. Their ratings are different.

400-500 "points" difference?

And we we already have another user made at roughly same time (dec 2021) with same name. So a back-up account for trolling? But yeah, most people don't start playing chess on different sites just to go on the usual "you all are tryhards, nolifers, my pp big, your pp all small". Or at least it's not really how normal people think and behave.

PRodigyya

Oh alr I was wondering homie troll troll 

PRodigyya
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Dmfed wrote:
nklristic skrev:

It is his. But it is on lichess. Their ratings are different.

400-500 "points" difference?

And we we already have another user made at roughly same time (dec 2021) with same name. So a back-up account for trolling? But yeah, most people don't start playing chess on different sites just to go on the usual "you all are tryhards, nolifers, my pp big, your pp all small". Or at least it's not really how normal people think and behave.

Everyone has a 400-500 point difference between their Chess.com and Lichess ratings because the cheat detection here on Chess.com is like something from 1998. 

That's true that's one big flaw on chess.com

Steven-ODonoghue
TacticalPrecision wrote:

New policy: Since ratings and results are totally arbitrary

New policy: please use GOOGLE to find out the meaning of the term arbitrary before you continue to misuse it, ok?

nklristic
Dmfed wrote:
nklristic skrev:

It is his. But it is on lichess. Their ratings are different.

400-500 "points" difference?

And we we already have another user made at roughly same time (dec 2021) with same name. So a back-up account for trolling? But yeah, most people don't start playing chess on different sites just to go on the usual "you all are tryhards, nolifers, my pp big, your pp all small". Or at least it's not really how normal people think and behave.

Yeah, lichess ratings are on average 300 points higher, sometimes less, sometimes more. That game was played there (it says in the diagram). They start from 1 500 there, that is why.


As for that same username here, well, I don't know, I see that it doesn't have any games and it was last online over a month ago, perhaps he forgot the password or simply decided to abandon that account.

nklristic
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Dmfed wrote:
nklristic skrev:

It is his. But it is on lichess. Their ratings are different.

400-500 "points" difference?

And we we already have another user made at roughly same time (dec 2021) with same name. So a back-up account for trolling? But yeah, most people don't start playing chess on different sites just to go on the usual "you all are tryhards, nolifers, my pp big, your pp all small". Or at least it's not really how normal people think and behave.

Everyone has a 400-500 point difference between their Chess.com and Lichess ratings because the cheat detection here on Chess.com is like something from 1998. 

That is not why. On lichess everyone start from 1 500. Here you can start from 400 even. That is the main difference.

Steven-ODonoghue
TacticalPrecision wrote:

It is arbitrary.

Incorrect. Once again, I reccommend google. Or maybe you should find a small child and get them to explain what arbitrary means to you in simple words.

Steven-ODonoghue
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You have a 2302 bullet rating.

Sounds like someone's bringing up my rating to disguise the fact that he doesn't know what arbitrary means... wink.png

catmaster0
Dmfed wrote:
mitchellr92 skrev:

I can't tell if you are a troll or not, but you are definitely entertaining.

Really, you can't? The user @TacticalPrecision (1280 isch) whose latest game diagram is for someone named @DigitalDestruction (1701) and yet he continue to talk as if it was his game, which it probably was because... "reasons". 

It's Lichess, they run on different numbers. Chess.com ratings are lower, so a 1200 Chess.com is better than a 1200 Lichess. So ratings-wise it's possible. 

TurpantineNYC
@TacticalPrecision stop trolling man. Going to a dead thread and talking about how intelligent you are, that girls find you attractive, that you aren’t like “us”(chess community?), and that the 70,000 people signing up to chess.com are losers that have nothing to do with the pandemic, while complaining that other 1200s don’t give you the respect you deserve by resigning after blundering a piece and that if they somehow win it was from engine assistance …. All this is hilarious. You’re a 1200 for a reason. A big reason is that even giving you a piece isn’t enough to ensure a loss against you. If you could ensure wins from a simple gain of material, maybe you wouldn’t be 1200. At the higher ELOs, people will resign more often. Some still don’t. Perhaps get there instead of complaining like an entitled brat that isn’t getting his 1200 elo ego stroked on an online game that you insult others for playing while playing it yourself all the while bragging that your mother calls you handsome. (Girls find me attractive)
Steven-ODonoghue
TacticalPrecision wrote:

I'm not a "1200". We don't classify players by their speed chess ratings

But if we did, you'd be a 900 happy.png

Steven-ODonoghue
TacticalPrecision wrote:

I'm still confused as to why you think 900 or 2000 makes any difference. 

Makes any difference to what? 900 means you are bad at chess, 2000 means you are good at chess. That's quite simple, no?

catmaster0

TacticalPrecision too busy getting roasted by everyone, oof. Got a few chuckles out of it but it's dragged out to the point that frankly, if it's intentional trolling on their part it's gotten sub-par now because they're overdoing just how stupid they are to the point it's stretching belief. If they aren't trolling then it's just someone with mental issues venting that's gotten out of hand. Either they've become a boring troll or too dumb to bother interacting with for the most part. Either way, I'm not bothering anymore. 

Steven-ODonoghue

Chess improves my life because it makes me happy, I have also taught dozens of kids the game, which makes me income (might want to google that word).

Now it's your turn, what does making these narcissistic posts about chess being meaningless do to improve your life? Surely someone as important as yourself has better things to do than make constant posts on a chess site? After all, chess is completely pointless and produces nothing

JamesColeman
TacticalPrecision wrote:

But whether you're bad or good means absolutely nothing in real life. How can you justify putting all of that time and effort into something nobody cares about and produces nothing, nor improves your life at all? 

Nothing better than walking through the door after a hard day, whacking out a technical ending and just analysing it for like 9 hours (while skipping dinner obviously). Do you not find that really relaxing and therapeutic?

Steven-ODonoghue
TacticalPrecision wrote:

That's right, and only a small minded imbecile could believe otherwise. 

I actually asked you a question, it is clear by now that your social skills are lacking, but typically when someone asks a question you should answer it instead of avoiding it by editing it out of the quote. tongue.png