ok
Why understanding chess is not the same as playing it
Chess also takes endurance...mental fatigue makes you lazy. Things like board vision tends to drop when fatigued as well. Never underestimate the human component.
I sometimes have this problem that I just a play a random move that looks fine. I don’t have a problem with it when it’s intuition, but this isn’t. It’s NO intuition and NO calculation either: Just a random "Natural Move".
I usually do this when I am confronted with direct threats or positions with pawn tensions for example. I feel like I have to brute-force calculate everything but there are just too many lines to calculate. And when I feel like I have to calculate checkmate or a attack on my king for example, I also start to do brute-force calculations.
And then these moves can be bad.
Just as a helpful tip, you may want to correct your title for this post/blog, for it does not have proper title capitalization. Instead of "Example example example", it should be "Example Example Example".
Just as a helpful tip, you may want to correct your title for this post/blog, for it does not have proper title capitalization. Instead of "Example example example", it should be "Example Example Example".
Thats not rly necessary on forums, if u look at any other non-official forum it’s not all capitalized
Over the years of playing and coaching chess, one thing I keep coming back to is how different it feels to “know” something in chess compared to actually using it in a real game.
In study or analysis, positions often feel clear and structured. But over the board, especially under time pressure or emotional tension, the same positions can feel much less obvious. Players often understand ideas in principle, but still struggle to find them when it matters in a real game.
For me, a lot of improvement seems to happen in this gap between knowledge and real decision making. It is not only about calculation or intuition separately, but about how the whole thinking process behaves when there is uncertainty, pressure, and limited time to think.
These kinds of questions eventually led me, together with a friend and student Kevin Smith, to structure some of these ideas into a Chessable course called “KIMPLOIDES: A Systemic Approach to Chess Analysis,” but for me the more interesting part is still the underlying question of how players actually think during real games.
I am curious how others experience this.
Do you feel your main challenges in games come more from calculation, intuition, or from handling uncertainty when the position becomes unclear?
And have you noticed a clear difference between what you understand while studying chess and what actually happens in your own games?