Will computers ever solve chess?


5 years later,
the question is unanswered
But, there have been breakthroughs in quantum computing.

Even with quantum computers chess can't be solved. As far as I know, quantum computers are only good at for example factorizing prime numbers but are not suitable for chess.

So we've lost 13+ pages of content since the last time I posted, assumedly due to banned/muted members...

Why would anyone even care? Can YOU memorize the billions of billions of lines that it would take to force that draw against every move your opponent might play?

Why would anyone even care? Can YOU memorize the billions of billions of lines that it would take to force that draw against every move your opponent might play?
Well, we do care. You are right. I also think that chess won't die out, because of that. Even in times of strong engines, people still find new ideas which engines can't find. I don't think that human creativity can be achieved by machines.
However that's not the point of this thread. The question is "Will computers ever solve chess?" and not "Will chess ever die out?". These are two different things.

I don’t know why people think that Chess hasn’t been solved yet. There’s about 7.3 billion chess matches played every year. With the four major chess sites playing about 20 million a day. I notice a lot of the high computer play the French Open. I notice a lot of the high computer to play the French Defense. I used to not like that opening and now I play it a lot. Obviously you have to solve it for each different open.
As far as I know Alpha figured it out. Since it wins every game it plays, then it has solved it. It seems logical to me to think that.


The definition and set of criteria for a "solved game" can be read about here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solved_game
It's pointless to say an engine is unbeatable (especially when it can play itself and not draw), so chess is solved. That is not what "solved" means in this context.