You Should Be Forced to Resign


  • 3 years ago · #1001

    Ubik42

    theMagicRabbit wrote:
    Ubik42 wrote:

    Well, apology accepted then. I will be happy to offer you a free spot in one of my courses "Mathematical rigor, parrallel computing, quantum mechanics, and its effects on the veracity of public forum discourse" once it becomes available in your area.

    This is a class at UT right?

    Just walk into the headmaster's office, ask for the class, and tell 'em Ubik sent you. And dont forget the 42 part, that ticks them off.

  • 3 years ago · #1002

    netzach

  • 3 years ago · #1003

    theMagicRabbit

    StrengthInPawns wrote:

    A 400+ hour supercomputing experiment has verified that the only posts of substance in this thread were written by me.

    I would be insulted.... if I had posted anything of substance

  • 3 years ago · #1004

    Ubik42

    The trolling we had to endure was epic.

  • 3 years ago · #1005

    Likhit1

    Opening i invinted.Peter's onslaught. White just wins a piece.

  • 3 years ago · #1006

    Likhit1

    FelixPlatypus wrote:

    better name is like it or likhit.

    lol

  • 3 years ago · #1007

    bsharpchess

    likhit1...in checkers, there is a version of it where you purposely try to lose. This opening you invented looks like the chess version of that. Since Black could have captured white's rook but chose not to.

  • 3 years ago · #1008

    Likhit1

    bsharpchess wrote:

    likhit1...in checkers, there is a version of it where you purposely try to lose. This opening you invented looks like the chess version of that. Since Black could have captured white's rook but chose not to.

    Capturing the rook gives white a clear advantage as black has given up the bishop pair and the rook on h3 wasnt doing much anyway.The bishop pair is far more important.

  • 3 years ago · #1009

    MrDamonSmith

    That's hilarious

  • 3 years ago · #1010

    bsharpchess

    silly me

  • 3 years ago · #1011

    Ubik42

    So, you should be forced to resign when you are down in material? Is there even a valid argument against it?

  • 3 years ago · #1012

    TheGrobe

    Really you should just be forced to resign if you are playing with the black pieces.

  • 3 years ago · #1013

    BorgQueen

    The mods should be forced to lock this stupid topic ^_^

  • 3 years ago · #1014

    Ubik42

    I agree, it has been basically settled anyway, by consensus. All thats left are drive-by trolls arguing against it.

  • 3 years ago · #1015

    netzach

    Only hope now then is to get one of them to swear, talk politics or religion?

    Then the whole thing can be laid to rest.

  • 3 years ago · #1016

    schlechter55

    f*** all false prophets.

  • 3 years ago · #1017

    Ubik42

    schlechter55 wrote:

    f*** all false prophets.

    Not all of them, just the ones opposing abortion.

  • 3 years ago · #1018

    schlechter55

    yeah, ubikcubic. Those are Jesus, Mohamed - thats what the Pope , and the Sheiks say.

  • 3 years ago · #1019

    schlechter55

    why is this forum still not closed ?


Back to Top
This forum topic has been locked.