You Should Be Forced to Resign - Chess Forums - Page 16

Petermh5

Apr 7, 2013

0

#301

Markle wrote:

Ubik42 wrote:

I have to agree with the OP. When someone is down in material by 3-5 points, they should just resign.

I havent seen any successful arguments against him, just a lot of trolling.

I think people that disagree with Petermh5 are either:

1. Perpetual losers who want to get back in the game via some cheapshot.

2. Trolling for attention.

3. Enjoy getting revenge from a legitamate victory by forcing the game to be played out.

These are the only possiblities I can see. There really is no arguing against his position, it is too solid. If I see you all continue to repeat the same futile, failed arguments, then I may write to the staff and see what can be done about all the trolling.

So if i sac a Knight for an attack i am now down 3 pts.and you think i should just resign, That is just a bunch of crap people resign when they want to NOT when you tell them to, so get over it.

No -- please give my rule a quick readover. It explicitly states five points or more, which is the equivalent of a rook. Thank you for your support.

sapientdust

Apr 7, 2013

0

#302

Petermh5 wrote:

blueemu wrote:

Petermh5 wrote:

You should automatically lose the game should you ever be down more than five points for two full turns.

So if you sac your Queen for a mate in four... you automatically lose?

>saccing your queen for a mate in four

Sacrificing is but a deeply-rooted flaw in the game of Chess. If you have to sacrifice pieces to win without getting a payout within AT LEAST two moves, then you really don't deserve to win. Wake up and smell the roses: that kind of cutesy bullshit would never hold up in the real world.

This deserves a place in the troll hall of fame.

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#303

Ubik42 wrote:

Minute 30 of not seeing any arguments to counter mine.

You aren't even serious about your arguments unless you are sort of insulting yourself-

AndyClifton wrote:

I suspect that he's yanking your chain a little bit...

Ubik42 wrote: Of course he is. The number of people taking him seriously is mind boggling.

falcogrine

Apr 7, 2013

0

#304

okay, we still have about 10,000 posts, give or take a lot, to become the most posted thread. Come on, we can do this!!!

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#305

lol

Petermh5

Apr 7, 2013

0

#306

Ubik42 wrote:

Minute 30 of not seeing any arguments to counter mine.

Over 300 posts and not one attempt at a refutation to my rule. Seriously, when can this go official? I think the rule should be implemented, and I can't see any serious, self-respecting player disagreeing with me. Unless they're so shit at Chess they need to exploit little bugs and loopholes in the rules to win.

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#307

Petermh5 wrote:

Ubik42 wrote:

Minute 30 of not seeing any arguments to counter mine.

Over 300 posts and not one attempt at a refutation to my rule. Seriously, when can this go official? I think the rule should be implemented, and I can't see any serious, self-respecting player disagreeing with me. Unless they're so shit at Chess they need to exploit little bugs and loopholes in the rules to win.

Great, another post. Lets go to 10000. Anyway, its not one attempt, more like 100. Loving how serious you trying to sound. XD

Ubik42

Apr 7, 2013

0

#308

Petermh5 wrote:

Ubik42 wrote:

Minute 30 of not seeing any arguments to counter mine.

Over 300 posts and not one attempt at a refutation to my rule. Seriously, when can this go official? I think the rule should be implemented, and I can't see any serious, self-respecting player disagreeing with me. Unless they're so shit at Chess they need to exploit little bugs and loopholes in the rules to win.

You have to give them time to write code. I am a former programmer. I wouldnt expect actual rule changes to be implemented until perhaps 3am Mountain time tonight.

falcogrine

Apr 7, 2013

0

#309

over 350...

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#310

Ubik42 wrote:

Petermh5 wrote:

Ubik42 wrote:

Minute 30 of not seeing any arguments to counter mine.

Over 300 posts and not one attempt at a refutation to my rule. Seriously, when can this go official? I think the rule should be implemented, and I can't see any serious, self-respecting player disagreeing with me. Unless they're so shit at Chess they need to exploit little bugs and loopholes in the rules to win.

You have to give them time to write code. I am a former programmer. I wouldnt expect actual rule changes to be implemented until perhaps 3am Mountain time tonight.

Thanks for making this a funny thread Ubik42.

falcogrine

Apr 7, 2013

0

#311

I second that.

Petermh5

Apr 7, 2013

0

#312

chessgdt wrote:

Great, another post. Lets go to 10000. Anyway, its not one attempt, more like 100. Loving how serious you trying to sound. XD

Go away, troll. I expect this thread to soon be undergoing professional or legal review, or both.

falcogrine

Apr 7, 2013

0

#313

But even more to peter, who started this whole thread!

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#314

chessgdt wrote:

Great, another post. Lets go to 10000. Anyway, its not one attempt, more like 100. Loving how serious you trying to sound. XD

Go away, Petermh5, The Troll. You are trolling so hard that its making me laugh. I don't want to hurt myself too much from pounding my hand on the ground while laughing.

falcogrine

Apr 7, 2013

0

#315

Petermh5 wrote:

chessgdt wrote:

Great, another post. Lets go to 10000. Anyway, its not one attempt, more like 100. Loving how serious you trying to sound. XD

Go away, troll. I expect this thread to soon be undergoing professional or legal review, or both.

who's launching a lawsuit against you?

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#316

falcogrine wrote:

Petermh5 wrote:

chessgdt wrote:

Great, another post. Lets go to 10000. Anyway, its not one attempt, more like 100. Loving how serious you trying to sound. XD

Go away, troll. I expect this thread to soon be undergoing professional or legal review, or both.

who's launching a lawsuit against you?

+1

Petermh5

Apr 7, 2013

0

#317

I am planning on submitting my idea for a patent. It has received too much positive feedback to continue to ignore. People have made millions for coming up with ideas that had no where near the incredible reception that my idea has had.

chessgdt

Apr 7, 2013

0

#318

Ubik42 wrote:

Oh surprise, no one responds to my arguments. That means your side doesnt have any.

Are you imitating the Gavinator? XD

falcogrine

Apr 7, 2013

0

#319

Petermh5 wrote:

I am planning on submitting my idea for a patent. It has received too much positive feedback to continue to ignore. People have made millions for coming up with ideas that had no where near the incredible reception that my idea has had.

lol. good luck!

Petermh5

Apr 7, 2013

0

#320

falcogrine wrote:

Petermh5 wrote:

I am planning on submitting my idea for a patent. It has received too much positive feedback to continue to ignore. People have made millions for coming up with ideas that had no where near the incredible reception that my idea has had.

lol. good luck!

Thank you for your support -- noted.