THERE HAS BEEN NO EXACT SAME CHESS GAME PLAYED BETWEEN COMPETANT PEOPLE. YES, THERE HAS BEEN BETWEEN INCOMPETANT PEOPLE (i.e. 4-move-checkmate) BUT NONE BETWEEN THE COMPETANT PEOPLE
a lone knight can giave a mate by firerods
Sort:
the_chairman wrote: i disagree entirly. chess has been play for an awfully long time and to beleive that everyone has had an individual and entirly new game every time is ridiculous. to say that this puzzle has been stolen is really quite pathetic in nature seeing as it would bring firerods nothing in gain to do so. and i would also like to point out he hasnt claimed it as his own puzzle he has merely posted it saying its his first puzzle poted. and even if he has he was probebly unaware of it before. when a new player starts a game they more than likely find anopening of there own not going into any books or references. that opening may bea very famous one however that doesnt mean they stole it. this is exactly the same.
Btw, nice puzzle
Apr 27, 2008
0
#24
Yasuandite wrote: the_chairman wrote: i disagree entirly. chess has been play for an awfully long time and to beleive that everyone has had an individual and entirly new game every time is ridiculous. to say that this puzzle has been stolen is really quite pathetic in nature seeing as it would bring firerods nothing in gain to do so. and i would also like to point out he hasnt claimed it as his own puzzle he has merely posted it saying its his first puzzle poted. and even if he has he was probebly unaware of it before. when a new player starts a game they more than likely find anopening of there own not going into any books or references. that opening may bea very famous one however that doesnt mean they stole it. this is exactly the same.
THERE HAS BEEN NO EXACT SAME CHESS GAME PLAYED BETWEEN COMPETANT PEOPLE. YES, THERE HAS BEEN BETWEEN INCOMPETANT PEOPLE (i.e. 4-move-checkmate) BUT NONE BETWEEN THE COMPETANT PEOPLE
ah my friend not quite true.
I played a game on another site not long ago where I drew a 2100ish player in 29 moves... the game (partially by coincidence) matched up PERFECTLY to one played by Kasparov (against some guy I don't remember his name)...
It has happened from time to time.
yep very good puzzle.
I disagree,I just played in a tourn. 2 weeks ago and played one game in particular a draw against a 2215 rated player that i was very happy with. Now to say this entire game has been played before from move one all the way to move 36 is just ridiculus.the_chairman wrote:
basically anything you do in chess is almost garentied to have happened somewhere before. yes this puzzle is known by lots of people but so are your games that you play. i guarentee that your games were once played by someone else before you. its the way the game is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkmate#Stamma.27s_mate
It's called Stamma's Mate after Philip Stamma.
(I didn't know this I just googled it)
Apr 27, 2008
0
#28
I'd assume most simple chess puzzles have come up some time in the past (anything with only four pieces, two of which are kings, has certainly been solved before), but I know I've seen this exact puzzle somewhere else on this site.
I don't have a link, and I don't have the next few minutes to search for it, but I know this exact puzzle is posted somewhere else on chess.com.
I'm not trying to accuse anyone of plagiarism or anything, but I know it's far from a unique puzzle. It's probably the title of the thread that's setting some people off.
nice
dylan wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkmate#Stamma.27s_mate
It's called Stamma's Mate after Philip Stamma.
(I didn't know this I just googled it)
Lol... Did you knowIm a dublo identity
Firerods also posted this same puzzle on Chess.com on July 27, 2007.
http://blog.chess.com/firerods/puzzle3
Apr 27, 2008
0
#32
i agree with tonightonly, most games are never repeated, only a very small amount of games are repeated
yes. most games arnt repeated. however positions are. a position in a game can be acheived in many different ways. to say that every position is origional is kinda holding to an ideal view of chess. most positions are found in different ways and to say that someone got to a position and found a certain mate from it is only possible through stealing someone elses ideas is very accusing, and is very disrespectfull to a player who may have found this out purely through their own gameplay. it almost seems like you beleive chess is played badly by anyone who isnt a top player, in reguards that if they happen to find a good or popular position that they must have stolen it from someone else. i dont agree with this.
nice puzzle
Reb wrote: The problem/puzzle presented is well known, I have seen it in various books over the years. It certainly was not created by the poster. The way he worded his statement its very easy to think that he meant he created it, and its the first time he has posted his creation, only he can say exactly what he meant. It would be interesting to hear from him at this point to clear it all up.
actually first my friend showed this puzzle to me and i posted it but i never knew it was from a book .sorry to all!!!
don"t worry i vl post another puzzle in no time
for all first it was posted in my own blog
firerods wrote: thanks Arrey yaar tum kion admit nahi karte k " you just posted this puzzle hadn't created If you do it wont degrade you trust me " yeah saley kuttey american kisy indians ko apne uper nahi dekh saktey. dfdsdsf
Abhey dsfd
yeah how do u know hindi
first time i saw it so thanks