About moving fast

I think i have to give up on Blitz games. I mostly loose on time and i do not have the slightest clue why. Last game did i loose to a guy in an endgame where i was three pawns that had advanced to 5,6 and 7th rank ahead. We had besides that both a rook left. We had moved 70 moves before my time ran out. He had 24 seconds left. Physically i don`t know how that is possible. Not the first game ending like that and i find it quite  frustrating. Quintessentially does that mean that my opponent used 2,2 seconds per move. Quite incredible if you ask me since he was 3 pawns down quite early in the game with a miserable position. As far as it comes to me you have to grab the piece and slip it just that takes about 2 seconds for me not to mention that we once in a while are supposed to think a little bit in a chess game. Well not much time for that? Any good explanation for that?

Play with 2 seconds increment perhaps?

Yeah maybe or just slow games. Could that have something to do with latency (for once not in my brain :) ) but with the connection?

Pre-moving recaptures is the answer (if you want to win fast games and lose slow ones).

Premoves take 0.1 seconds per move off your clock.  In a trivially winning position good blitz/bullet players only need a few seconds on their clock to finish off the opponent.  Similarly when all you have is a rook left you can premove it back and forth with checks.  Your opponent may have averaged 2 seconds per move, but only after 20 moves at the end taking 0.1 seconds each for example.

A chess game where you have to think?  Play long games or at least add some increment.  Yes, no increment bullet/blitz often becomes who is better at beating the clock at the end.

He said above "In a trivially winning position good blitz/bullet players only need a few seconds on their clock to finish off the opponent." -- I can't comment on that except informally because of chess.com's censorship; but Wow, what a spectacle internet chat produces. For those who haven't played speed chess: note that "trivially winning positions" in chess can take dozens and dozens of moves to complete, and so that chat statement claiming "only seconds" is incorrect, but no one can fix it because chess.com forces us to "be kind" in their chat, which means they want us to be sloppy, and mean to the intelligent, like they are (and most of the monitors of the internet). If you play around 100,000 games like I have you'll notice Lichess.org has a much faster piece move algorithm that causes less games to be lost on time, but that site has troubles in other areas, so whether or not to switch sites is a complicated decision. But the speed difference between the websites indicates to me that chess.com could improve their piece movement programing to match lichess.org's, if they cared about improving, or stopped being afraid to be "unkind" to the unscrupulous who like the status quo.