I think Martin_Stahl has the technical side of this issue right, as far as most people go.
And he is certainly helping this discussion in patiently pointing this out to people new to this thread, who are still wondering if it is them or chess.com.
Anyway I don't like the "Relax, It's not a bug, it's a 'non-feature'" - notion of his summaries.
This is so basic and so drastically lacking within the sourrounding features of simple analysis (non-game-review), that to me this is a HUGE bug, that definitely needs more fixing and less getting-used-to-it.
So I'm still happy about everyone voicing their discontent here, even if the technical side of it has now sufficiently been explained. And please do use the "report bug" feature of the website, otherwise nothing will ever be done to fix this, as it seems.
I very much agree. Reportedly it was available on web before without running a game review, but it got removed. I can't help to think this was deliberately done in order to incentivize people to buy the paid plan — which I don't blame them for, but I wish there was more transparency regarding this issue.
I think Martin_Stahl has the technical side of this issue right, as far as most people go.
And he is certainly helping this discussion in patiently pointing this out to people new to this thread, who are still wondering if it is them or chess.com.
Anyway I don't like the "Relax, It's not a bug, it's a 'non-feature'" - notion of his summaries.
This is so basic and so drastically lacking within the sourrounding features of simple analysis (non-game-review), that to me this is a HUGE bug, that definitely needs more fixing and less getting-used-to-it.
So I'm still happy about everyone voicing their discontent here, even if the technical side of it has now sufficiently been explained. And please do use the "report bug" feature of the website, otherwise nothing will ever be done to fix this, as it seems.