The_Tracer wrote:
A game has to be 4 moves long to for it to be accountable for a change in rating. And here it is 5 moves long so it should've changed.
Your knowledge concerning the minimum number of moves is inaccurate. See previous posts.
best win rating did not go up...
Sort:
it's not it is 4. I remember erik saying that ages ago.
unless it's changed to 5. It always used to be four. But really there shouldn't be a number, just my opinion.
The_Tracer wrote:
A game has to be 4 moves long to for it to be accountable for a change in rating. And here it is 5 moves long so it should've changed.
It should've but it didn't change so I don't get it.
The_Tracer wrote:
it's not it is 4. I remember erik saying that ages ago.
Now look what you've done. You confused the OP :(
The OP asked why the best win did not change. You are discussing minimum number of moves for a rating to be affected. If you read post #9 you would have seen this http://support.chess.com/Knowledgebase/Article/View/19/0/the-game-ended-and-my-rating-didnt-change-at-all-why
 subaru555 (1243) |
 willboy1 (1356) |
1-0 (won) | 1|0 | 3 | 12/14/2011 | view | |
 |
subaru555 (1233) |
 Danjmilan (1240) |
1-0 (won) | 1|0 | 19 | 12/14/2011 | vi |
| subaru555 (1241) |
 RedBlackOrange(1149) |
draw | 1|0 | 0 | 12/11/2011 | view | |
|
subaru555 (1243) |
 skittless (1343) |
1-0 (won) | 1|0 | 20 | 12/11/2011 | view |
You have to take my word about 7 plies for a timeout in post #10.
A game has to be 4 moves long to for it to be accountable for a change in rating. And here it is 5 moves long so it should've changed.