Conditional Move Idea...

24 hours and counting

If you both manage to carry this on until xmas day i'll buy you both a beer

If you had delivered even one argument against conditional moves, we had something to talk about.  Otherwise this discussion is pointless.

If you had apologized for cherry-picking my arguments, and twisting my words blatantly and repeatedly, we would have something to discuss. Since you haven't, any further discussion with you is pointless.

Here we go again. You're attacking me personally instead of delivering any arguments against  conditional moves.

Why are they so bad in your opinion? 

Here we go again. Why are you lying so blatantly in a public forum?

From #32:

''

[me]»4. "Your fourth mistake is that nobody forces you to make use of conditional moves yourself." - Yet another claim which I never made. Straw man argument. Your 4rth error.«

[you] I give you that, you never claimed this in your posts. I just inferred it from your vocal opposition against conditional moves. I take that back.

''

Pretending that you don't see the arguments of the other side, while at the same time you blatantly lying simply leads to your self-ridicule. I don't know why you're doing it but it certainly is amusing. 😄

I admitted I've interfered something you might didn't meant to say in one point. That happens in every discussion and I'm adult enough to admit it. 

But here comes the question again: Do you have any arguments against conditional moves?

Why are you lying? Why are you not apologizing for twisting my words?

"Twisting someone's words" is to nit-pick on someone's verbal expressions whilst ignoring the author's intention. I didn't do that but tried to take your intentions seriously. I didn't lie before and I'm not lying now.

But here comes the question again: Do you have any arguments against conditional moves?

Here comes the question again: why are you refusing to apologize for lying and twisting my words, serial liar?

Because I did neither. 

You are lying again. 😄

I am tired of hearing your accusations towards me. Even if they would be true – in a kind of parallel universe – they wouldn't add anything to prove your point.

So what's your point, I'm asking for the third time in a row, do you have any arguments against conditional moves?

Your trolling tactics have failed. Apologize for your lies and malice.

No one has a duty to apologize. You're not the judge here. Are you going to answer his question or show decline to?

I do not care about your opinion.

If you don't care about other's opinions, why do you post in a public forum at all?

Your lies and malice have been exposed and it's high time you apologized.

Any update on this?

My understanding is it's something planned eventually but is very low priority.