http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/6292009---distraction-tactics
Well on this one black isnt a complete retard, but close enough
HARDER PROBLEMS
Sort:
nuclearturkey wrote:
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:
You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?!
I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.
It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard
I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.
Yes, just because you don't understand the moves doesn't mean they are bad. Spend a little more time on the problems, and you'll see that all of the moves are forced or preventative, with no better options.
MaddFunn wrote:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/6292009---distraction-tactics
Well on this one black isnt a complete retard, but close enough
I presume you mean White, and it seems he made the best possible moves actually.
MaddFunn wrote:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/6292009---distraction-tactics
Well on this one black isnt a complete retard, but close enough
What's wrong with that problem?
Nov 1, 2009
0
#26
ChessNinjaMaster wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:
You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?!
I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.
It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard
I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.
Yes, just because you don't understand the moves doesn't mean they are bad. Spend a little more time on the problems, and you'll see that all of the moves are forced or preventative, with no better options.
look to the example
MaddFunn wrote:
ChessNinjaMaster wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
MaddFunn wrote:
Reb wrote:
You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?!
I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.
It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard
I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.
Yes, just because you don't understand the moves doesn't mean they are bad. Spend a little more time on the problems, and you'll see that all of the moves are forced or preventative, with no better options.
look to the example
Like both nuclearturkey and I have said, the example has the best moves in it.
You really think you can solve problems that Carlsen and Topalov work on ?!
I would guess anyone could, if they took long enough.
It isnt the problem that the problems are easy just the losing side in the puzzle nearly always plays like a complete retard
I have yet to see a daily puzzle where this is the case.