@mickinmd You probably should have read the thread. Not only is it 8 and a half years old, the OP acknowledged the stalemate rule.
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
Thanks for trying to explain but this feels unfair, I trapped him fair and square! He moved in to this position, he could have moved elsewhere and so it was his bad. His king was trapped, not mine and so I still feel this should have been a checkmate victory for me.
I thought that stalemate was when the kings were left going round endlessly and so the game would have no conclusion. Didn't my game clonclude when I rendered his king immobile? If its his move and he can't move then surely that makes me the winner?
I'm sure it's a tough rule to spring on you, but in all fairness you should have studied the rules of chess enough to know that a King that is not in check with no legal move is stalemated, not checkmated.
Think of it this way: throughout history there are examples of cities being besieged, like Leningrad in WW2, where the inhabitants could do nothing about the siege yet they were not defeated. A chess player without a legal move is in roughly the same state.