MY PUZZLE RATING DROPPED A THOUSAND POINTS FOR NO REASON

Sort:
Avatar of MrChatty
R_o1993 wrote:

Mine dropped from 2500 to 1700. Can this be fixed???

That drop is the fix itself

Avatar of thing50

Lets face it...the puzzles were weak and the puzzle rating was vastly over inflated...lets get real now with this new rating system and refined puzzle rating ok?

Lets get back to reality...

Avatar of brianlane723

Same thing happened to me and my highest rating from yesterday is lower by 1000 in the score than on the graph.

Avatar of Weirdgerman

#Changeitback

Avatar of MrChatty
Weirdgerman wrote:

#Changeitback

Nah, they won't

Avatar of Weirdgerman
MrChatty hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

#Changeitback

Nah, they won't

They changed back views because the resistance was big enough

Avatar of MrChatty
Weirdgerman wrote:

They changed back views because the resistance was big enough

Ok, keep resisting

Avatar of A76D

The same for me: from 2383 to 1640 in 24 hours and without playing!

Avatar of V_Awful_Chess
Weirdgerman wrote:
MrChatty hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

#Changeitback

Nah, they won't

They changed back views because the resistance was big enough

This is a good change, they shouldn't change it back.

They should have done this a long time ago.

Avatar of V_Awful_Chess

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

Avatar of V_Awful_Chess
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

It was a strong indicator the puzzle rating system had gone completely out of chess.com 's control.

It also didn't work terribly well with the definition of the elo/glicko system.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

It was a strong indicator the puzzle rating system had gone completely out of chess.com 's control.

It also didn't work terribly well with the definition of the elo/glicko system.

It motivated people to do puzzles tho, i managed to amass 170K puzzle points, now im not gonna ever do enough to hit 10K puzzle points

Avatar of V_Awful_Chess
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

It was a strong indicator the puzzle rating system had gone completely out of chess.com 's control.

It also didn't work terribly well with the definition of the elo/glicko system.

It motivated people to do puzzles tho, i managed to amass 170K puzzle points, now im not gonna ever do enough to hit 10K puzzle points

I'm a bit confused because that's not what your rating history says.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

It was a strong indicator the puzzle rating system had gone completely out of chess.com 's control.

It also didn't work terribly well with the definition of the elo/glicko system.

It motivated people to do puzzles tho, i managed to amass 170K puzzle points, now im not gonna ever do enough to hit 10K puzzle points

I'm a bit confused because that's not what your rating history says.

Points not rating, you should know the difference

Avatar of V_Awful_Chess
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

It was a strong indicator the puzzle rating system had gone completely out of chess.com 's control.

It also didn't work terribly well with the definition of the elo/glicko system.

It motivated people to do puzzles tho, i managed to amass 170K puzzle points, now im not gonna ever do enough to hit 10K puzzle points

I'm a bit confused because that's not what your rating history says.

Points not rating, you should know the difference

Did they even change the points system?

I didn't know anyone cared about the points system, frankly I'd have been fine if they removed it entirely.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
V_Awful_Chess hat geschrieben:

To see how much more sense this makes, look at the current puzzles leaderboard:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/tactics

I will remind you under the previous system there were people with puzzle ratings in the tens of thousands.

whats wrong with that? I dont want to do puzzles anymore, cuz theres no bragging rights like "I hit 3500"

It was a strong indicator the puzzle rating system had gone completely out of chess.com 's control.

It also didn't work terribly well with the definition of the elo/glicko system.

It motivated people to do puzzles tho, i managed to amass 170K puzzle points, now im not gonna ever do enough to hit 10K puzzle points

I'm a bit confused because that's not what your rating history says.

Points not rating, you should know the difference

Did they even change the points system?

I didn't know anyone cared about the points system, frankly I'd have been fine if they removed it entirely.

:FAcepalm. everybody who i know who cares about improvement loves it, and tbh it motivated me to do more puzzles, cuz i wanted to get into legend. Now i understand why some people dont like low rated people in forums

Avatar of muskiewhisperer

Mine did too!

Randomly, yesterday.

I also can't get the puzzles to work at all at the moment. All other areas of the site are working just fine for me. Is this a bug?

Avatar of MrChatty
muskiewhisperer wrote:

Is this a bug?

It is not a bug, it is a feature

Avatar of Weirdgerman

i rather have a bug than a bad feature