Tactics trainer problems, # of Attempts


The # of attempts is correct. And yes, it's because there is a huge skew, we have LOTS of VERY hard problems in the database, rated over 2000:
http://www.chess.com/tactics/problems.html?sortby=rating_hard
You can see that almost all of these only have 1 or 2 attempts.

It's a little concerning that there is such a huge skew, I hope everything is ok with the system.
I noticed something else that doesn't make sense to me. I looked at the problems sorted by highest rating first and clicked through to see how many high rated problems there are. There appear to be a few thousand problems rated over 2000 with just a couple of attempts and a few thousand problems rated right at 2000 with no attempts. This isn't reflected in the problem rating graph. I guess this graph is only for problems with a significant number of attempts? There seems to be at the moment something less than 1000 problems represented in that graph?



Also don't know if you noticed but I added all of these as well. I also now show your score clearly upon finishing a problem so that your rating adjustment makes a little more sense.

In case anyone thinks I'm just a complainer: Thank you jay!
The tactics trainer is a really nice feature, one worth paying for once everything is ironed out ;-). Good luck making it the best it can be.


Erik, when you mention the option of seeing the text of the computer analysis, that helps to explain why the certain moves were made? Boy, that would be very cool! I have done a few of these puzzles on other sites, and not always followed why different moves were done.
When viewing the tactics trainer problems info (http://www.chess.com/tactics/problems.html) the second column is labelled "Attempts". I thought this would be the number of times a particular problem has been attempted, but these numbers are in the hundreds (for the lowest rated problems) while the average number of attempts is 8. Is there really this huge skew in the distrubution of number of attempts?