What rating was Fritz 11 set to? That's really the main question. Without this information, how can we judge how well you actually did? (Besides giving us the game itself...)
DEfeating Fritz 11
Sort:
Jul 18, 2009
0
#3
I have deafeted Fritz11 thrice! But ofcourse, I kept it on the medium level... 
I played 3491 rated Fritz and I was black and I haev been laying for 500 days only
I didn't take back any moves
amaan2 wrote:
I played 3491 rated Fritz and I was black and I haev been laying for 500 days only
It wouldn't matter if you had played the game your whole life, you would never, ever beat Fritz 11. It's doubtful any human could.
Congratulations on beating a 3400+!!! That takes true skill!
You must truely be a great chess player!
G
IT was 30 minute rated
Actually Kasprov couldn't beat it because it was 6 hour blitz
I am going to debunk this guy...
amaan2 wrote:
I played 3491 rated Fritz and I was black and I haev been laying for 500 days only
He can't seem to even spell "have" and "playing" correctly, and a 3491 rated Fritz would require an extremely powerful computer. Also, how would he know if he were playing chess for exactly 500 days? Does he keep track of each day that passes by?
amaan2 wrote:
IT was 30 minute rated
amaan2 wrote:
Actually Kasprov couldn't beat it because it was 6 hour blitz
He also claims to have beaten Fritz 11 in a 30 minute rated game, and explains that "Kasprov" [sic] lost because he played 6 hr. blitz with Fritz. First off, there's no such thing as 6hr. blitz. Secondly, Kasparov having an extra 5.5 hrs. would only help him... How would he lose because of an extra 5.5 hrs?
amaan2 must be a twelve year old or something... I'm even more dumbfounded by G-Money7's comment
G-Money7 wrote:
Congratulations on beating a 3400+!!! That takes true skill!
You must truely be a great chess player!
I really hope he was being sarcastic, especially when he has 2847 member points...
Regarding the "500 days" issue, it's possible that amaan2 was estimating. 500 days could simply be a substitute for "approximately a year and a third."
On a different note, how does my number of member points correlate to my intelligence? You seem to imply in your post that people who post often should be less gullible, if I'm reading it correctly...
Jul 20, 2009
0
#12
I don't have the game but I have a different one in which I drew it
Jul 28, 2009
0
#14
Rybka, the strongest engine, has a top rating of 3238, but I'm sure Fritz can go to 3400..
Jul 28, 2009
0
#15
I'm an administrator on a chess site, and I see this time and again: folks saying outlandish things to get attention on the Internet. It works, but it usually isn't the kind of attention they wanted lol.
Without the game, the settings, the details of his machine, what hashtables he was running - it is 100% useless information.
KingStreets wrote:
G-Money7 wrote:
Congratulations on beating a 3400+!!! That takes true skill!
You must truely be a great chess player!
G
I really do hope you have an auto-poster or are being sarcastic.
How do auto-posters even work? I'm not sure if such a thing can exist...
I put thought and effort into my posts, and I was congratulating this person for his stunning accomplishment. I certainly can't beat Fritz, and I doubt many people can. That was truely a great accomplishment and amaan was deserving of the praise. He must have played extremely well, and I congratulate him.
G
rich wrote:
But no one who has a rating of 805 can't beat fritz.
I would disagree. When I was 805, Fritz would beat me in 5 moves! This person played the best game of his life, for sure!
G
rich wrote:
But fritz 11 beat Kasparov before, it would be impossible for him to play that strong.
Not impossible, but highly unlikely. You said that there's no way an 805 can't beat Fritz 11.
G
thanks for the 'joke' of the week.......I get it
Fritz 11 was white and I was black my rating is 805 and i defeated it
In the end Fritz 11 resigned because I had a queen and a bishop and they had nothing this was after 74 moves and 30 minute blitz