Well the last game I played against you I managed to mate you with just a queen, but most of the time I play with the goal to out-time the opponenet
Do you like to win on time on Bullet or actually mating?

Well the last game I played against you I managed to mate you with just a queen, but most of the time I play with the goal to out-time the opponenet
I was trying to out time you but then i lost too many pieces

I like to 'mate' in bullet. Although, getting your opponent into time pressure helps bring a mate sooner than later.

I'll take anything. If I can force a win on time by playing a complicated series of checks, I'll do it.

My bullet wins are mostly mates, but my opponents seems to beg for it by playing passively to win on time.

i think mating is the "right" ending of a game.
i often lose on time when i'm some pieces ahead and win when i'm without a pawn. bullet is a strange play, more similar to a cat fight than to a chess game. but i must admit i have lost two three-days-per-move games just because i forgot i had to move.
finally, i rather like to win for my good playing (if i'm capable of any) than because of my opponent's lack of time.
p.s. anyway, winning is winning.

I just play moves. Don't give a hoot whether the thing tells me I lost or won at the end of it :p I know I played badly in either case. But each game gets me through life another two interesting minutes at least. :-)
I do not view winning on time as a true victory. You can say "A win is a win", but the truth is not all players can move the pieces fast enough.
Chess is a game of the mind, not a game of dexterity.
I broke one of my fingers in the summer, and my hand can not click as fast as it used to.
I dislike bullet chess simply because I feel more emphasis is put on how quickly you move your hand, and not how quickly u think.
In Bullet most of the time the game ends with time running out. Do you like it to win by the clock or do you want to win by actually winning?