DRAW - Why??
Sort:
Stalemate-If the king is not in check, and the opponent has no legal moves, (pieces, pawns, and/or king) It’s counted as a draw, sry, GG, RIP
vinaygore wrote:
Stalemate-If the king is not in check, and the opponent has no legal moves, (pieces, pawns, and/or king) It’s counted as a draw, sry, GG, RIP
You are 4 years late.
Idk
I mean idc
.
iCvBi wrote:
.
When we reach the posting of periods, it's time to lock the thread.
renansouzones wrote:
But that happened because I left him without any more pieces left rather than the king, shouldn't it count as a Checkmate? It's so unfair to lose with that huge advantage!
Just learn the rules of chess before you take to the forums to comlain and make a comlete fool of yourself.
DrSpudnik wrote:
iCvBi wrote:
.
When we reach the posting of periods, it's time to lock the thread.
.
ThunderBones wrote:
I had a Queens king and Castle left, my opponent had a king left, he made 4 consecutive same movement, I was going to go in for the kill and then…it was a draw😵💫
Might have been a draw by threefold repetition. Can you post a link to the game?
Stalemates are so funny 😂
if you don't like the stalemate rule, just quit chess! its not that hard for a 500ELO
Thepasswordis1234 wrote:
if you don't like the stalemate rule, just quit chess! its not that hard for a 500ELO
I think he did...
I’ve gotten stalemates when my opponent can still make moves before one move away from checkmate, not sure if that’s the entire rule behind stalemate
renansouzones wrote:
I'm a new player and don't know much about chess rules, but the last game I played (image below) I left the other player only with his king and it was marked as a Draw. Why is that? Wasn't I supposed to be the winner, since I had many forms to Checkmate him?
This is a stalemate. Your opponent has no leagl moves.
EnPassantAvalanche wrote:
renansouzones wrote:
I'm a new player and don't know much about chess rules, but the last game I played (image below) I left the other player only with his king and it was marked as a Draw. Why is that? Wasn't I supposed to be the winner, since I had many forms to Checkmate him?
This is a stalemate. Your opponent has no leagl moves.
Aren't you a bit late? A dozen guys have already pointed this out, more than 6 years ago.
chukn123 wrote:
I’ve gotten stalemates when my opponent can still make moves before one move away from checkmate, not sure if that’s the entire rule behind stalemate
That's not possible. Show an example.
magipi wrote:
chukn123 wrote:
I’ve gotten stalemates when my opponent can still make moves before one move away from checkmate, not sure if that’s the entire rule behind stalemate
That's not possible. Show an example.
I may be misremembering something about the board state I thought of sorry
chukn123 wrote:
I’ve gotten stalemates when my opponent can still make moves before one move away from checkmate, not sure if that’s the entire rule behind stalemate
Do you mean a stalemate or a draw?
A stalemate is a type of draw, but it is not the only type of draw.
If it was a stalemate specifically, it might be the piece you thought could move was pinned.
At a low level, the possibility of stalemate should motivate a player to continue a game even if it's completely hopeless in terms of material, because the chance of it happening is real (making a stalemate with such an advantage is a blunder, but blunders happen all the time at that level).
Of course, when players reach a certain level, they don't even finish the game until checkmate, when the outcome becomes certain, assuming that they know how to checkmate.
But that happened because I left him without any more pieces left rather than the king, shouldn't it count as a Checkmate? It's so unfair to lose with that huge advantage!
Listen, grasshopper, those are the rules. Get used to it.