Players who leave game just after it starts.
Sort:
[COMMENT DELETED]
That's a good suggestion.
[COMMENT DELETED]
kaynight wrote:
It's not quite Shakespeare, but it has a certain rhythm to it.
I'm sure the activity described requires a certain rhythm.
ahahahahahahahah kleelof, you forgot the emoticom. "Think about sucking penis alot?" 
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
ahahahahahahahah kleelof, you forgot the emoticom. "Think about sucking penis alot?"
XD
That scares me. A lot.
I agree
Thanks for all your helpful input guys. I am eternally grateful.
Woot. This is an important issue.
Aug 7, 2015
0
#14
Gm_andrewfeng wrote:
Woot. This is an important issue.
So important that there's literally been well over 100 other topics about it.
imasculptor wrote:
If it's that important then why aren't people that do it reported and penalized for it? Take points off their ranking, publish a list so others won't make the mistake of playing with them.
It's one of the big reasons that so few people chance playing live standard chess here (in comparison to the number of blitz and bullet games). I know that some people may just be on a big think but I don't know why they can't implement a move timer and ask a simple Y/N question "Still there?" after 5 minutes or so to confirm that people are still thinking and declare a time forfeit if someone doesn't answer within 30 seconds.
It's not like we're playing serious tournament chess here.
I would play live standard chess more if I hadn't been left hanging out to dry several times.
You agreed to let each player have 30 minutes each. How she/he uses her/his time is totally up to her/him.
What she/he is doing is not against the rules. So please tell me why she/he should be punished?
VyboR wrote:
You agreed to let each player have 30 minutes each. How she/he uses her/his time is totally up to her/him.
Sorry, logic is not allowed.
Aug 7, 2015
0
#18
kleelof wrote:
VyboR wrote:
You agreed to let each player have 30 minutes each. How she/he uses her/his time is totally up to her/him.
Sorry, logic is not allowed.
Logic in ragetopics = futile
VyboR wrote:
You agreed to let each player have 30 minutes each. How she/he uses her/his time is totally up to her/him.
What she/he is doing is not against the rules. So please tell me why she/he should be punished?
Says the member who has never played a game here...
// I hope you're not going to say that one doesn't have to sit around for 25 minutes waiting for an invisible opponent to move to actually know what it is like.
notmtwain wrote:
VyboR wrote:
You agreed to let each player have 30 minutes each. How she/he uses her/his time is totally up to her/him.
What she/he is doing is not against the rules. So please tell me why she/he should be punished?
Says the member who has never played a game here...
// I hope you're not going to say that one doesn't have to sit around for 25 minutes waiting for an invisible opponent to move to actually know what it is like.
Why would I need to have played a game here in order to know what it is like to wait 25 minutes for an invisible opponent to move?
So I was just playing this standard 30 min game with this guy rashidallam and after I made a few good moves, around 10 minutes of both our time, he stopped moving. I had to wait 20 minutes for the game to end as I didn't want to resign. I went to his profile and saw a few others who posted notes there that he had done the same with them. Why does Chess.com allow these kind of people to play?