excuses or not the fact remains that cheating is quite common especially in standard tournaments.
Standard Ratings Boost

excuses or not the fact remains that cheating is quite common especially in standard tournaments.
Perhaps so. But accusations are better supported with proof rather than faceless statements like 'the last 3 of 7 games had cheaters' or "1300's making error-free moves'. These must make the people talking sound like sore losers.

it is not my job to play the cheater slayer.i guess if the site wants they can catch them and ban them.

it is not my job to play the cheater slayer.i guess if the site wants they can catch them and ban them.
Yeah, you're right.
But I do like the idea of a Cheater Slayer. Would you get to dress-up like Conan the Barbarian and carry a big-ass sword?

???
Conan the Barbarian was T-H-E......M-A-N. I feel bad for the grunting and groaning cheater in a ape-mask costume trying to hug him. 'Nuff said.

What?? You want to be dragged by your hair to start the year? He does not care about personal hygiene, his car probably is a dump and he shags chimpanzees.. Or was that Tarzan. I always confuse the two. Or are you called prudentia because you are looking for a dangerous life among these chess gangstas?

Still too many cheaters in Standard. I have had three cheaters in my last 7 games in standard, and now have just quit playing standard and stopped being a premium member. The last cheater that I reported, had won 64 games in a row before I reported him. There should be an algorithm that detects any statistical anomaly's like that
Of course. Myself I ponder on quitting turn-based games.
Hi, can anyone clarify whether the live ratings boost has been affecting the TT ratings? I thought that the time it takes to do a puzzle (and therefore the scoring) is linked to solver's live ratings and their average solving times. Maybe I'm imagining that, but I thought I had read it some time ago. Thanks

I don't think so. I wasn't about to wade through the whole thread, but I'm pretty sure Erik said this was a once and done affair.

hello community!
today we will be "boosting" the standard ratings for all active standard players in live chess.
for multiple reasons, many of which we've narrowed down and some of which we can't even explain, the standard ratings in live chess are WAY too low.
on average, people's ratings are hundreds of points lower than their actual "over the board" strength. even our titled players are often unable to break over 2000 given that the pool of players (because everyone starts at 1200) is simply so low.
a scientific evaluation by our staff of our system has suggested to us that the best, most efficient way to fix this is "problem" to simply "inflate" (don't worry, we aren't printing money here ) all ratings by an amount that we deem most reasonable for each rating class:



If they EVER took somethin like how an Elo is calculated. For any game. And applied a polynomial equation to jus suddenly add X points to everybody. Then it explains a lot. And u know it wasnt very *scientific* like they claim it was. The original thread looks like BS and my math teacher wud flunk them.
sandbaggers
Sandbagging so they can cheat with an engine?
Can you hear yourself talking?