THE MANNERS

The bullet players who play on this site should learn manners. If we were about to lose and still win simply because it helped by time, we should give a chance to our opponents for the next game.

For example:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568039721

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568048737

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568144503

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568573974

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568707303

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568711252

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568779179

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=568791698

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=570198190

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=569061874

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=570809696

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=570883547

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=571078081

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=571097114

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=572482781

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=575281333

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=576071547

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=576526509

How many bullet games do you not win by time?Giving or accepting a rematch is not obligatory.It is just a choice.

no rematch=COWARD!!!!!

it is very rude!!!!

I don't mind if you win by time and you also have a balanced position, even better than the opponent.

Is often the case, a player wins because of the time only (lagging), but in fact he had lost a chess position, then he run and refused to play again.

He left his opponents in a curious situation, I think this is obviously not polite.

Bullet is a legal move making contest.  It is not a game of chess proper.  Time is not only part of the game, it is most of the game.  You can't expect anyone to show you any kind of respect or what you refer to as manners.  Winning is all there is.

+1.

I agree that "Won on Time" is also a victory and a legitimate part of the bullet game. However, the core problem is the habit of running out of offers to play again after he won only once, and the victory was also due to the time factor.

"and the victory was also due to the time factor" - cross out this sentence.  It is distracting.  Doesn't matter how he won.

Yes, it is somewhat unsporting for a bullet player to leave after only playing one game.  What are you going to do about it though?  You cannot FORCE someone to play more than one game of chess if they don't want to.  Chess.com is based in the US and we had this thing called the Emancipation Proclamation a while ago.  This is pointless complaining.

[COMMENT DELETED by moderator. Please watch your language.]

...."the habit of running out of offers to play again after he won only once, and the victory was also due to the time factor."

See the underlined sentence above !

-------------
I agree that the time factor is the most crucial component in the bullet However, it doesn't mean we're playing solely oriented on the victory of the time that ignores quality. Worse, many players of this type also have a brave dwarf, they ran after winning one game.

That's exactly what bullet chess is all about.  Didn't you read my post?

In this game, my opponent just win time, but lose quality. Surprisingly, he refused my offer to play again and then ran away.

For examples:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=567260332

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=567394322

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=567861083

>GreenCastleBlock :
I'm glad, you have made a lot of comments. Excuse me, did you ever play the bullet? How many bullet points do you have?

your opponent made the right choice by refusing you.

i'd like to play you in bullet -- beat you on time, then refuse your silly rematch request.

So basically if you lose you're entitled to a rematch? No.

It doesn't matter how you lost.

nothing matters!

once i plaid this dude in bullet.  i won (of course).  he then offered a rematch.  i totally refused.

the comedy is blowing my kneecaps off.