''Was your opponent a good/bad sport?"

Sort:
Avatar of PrivateGiant

I am the type of chess.com player that never accept a rematch. I prefer different opponents in each and every game. Am I prone of getting a lot to "bad sport" score?

Avatar of PrivateGiant

I agree IM.

Avatar of PrivateGiant

And I think (I hope I am wrong}  bad sports  get paired with engine users.

Avatar of PrivateGiant

No stay here this is the best chess website. We can suggest instead.

Avatar of ericthatwho

Well if they play you they are "good" sports

Enable safe mod in setting (privacy)

Avatar of DrDeath1
How about time increment while playing pure 1 minute bullet chess, how sporty is that?
Avatar of DrDeath1
You playing as fast as you can ..they take their time thinking and you loose regardless..
Avatar of DrDeath1
I am a bullet player and if that situation don’t stop, I will be forced to quit this site.
Avatar of DrDeath1
ICC May be expensive..but the players are fair.
Avatar of jdcannon
IMBacon wrote:
PrivateGiant wrote:

And I think (I hope I am wrong}  bad sports  get paired with engine users.

I don't play on this site anymore, so i don't know.

 

If we know they are an engine user we close the account. They are not paired with anyone.

Avatar of ericthatwho

Computer users should not be confused with bad sportsmen nor should they be kicked.

They should be "flagged as computer users" and only paired with similar flagged computer user.

They should not be able to see their own "flag" but everybody else should same for name and shame etc. Lets say some one challenges them or invites them to a team the invitor and team members should see the flag. And someone who tells them is probably married

Mods should say "you poor thing" only,perhaps not even that.

Avatar of PrivateGiant
jdcannon wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
PrivateGiant wrote:

And I think (I hope I am wrong}  bad sports  get paired with engine users.

I don't play on this site anymore, so i don't know.

 

If we know they are an engine user we close the account. They are not paired with anyone.

Thank you chess.com. I got an email that you guys are checking my games for engine user opponents. I appreciate the fast responses.

Avatar of chungle

AH HA!

 

So,...label someone a poor sport and boom.  This can now be gamed.  Nice one Chess.com.

 

Avatar of jdcannon

That message is unrelated to poor sport and only happens when we detect someone abandoned their game. You could never cause someone to get that warning by thumbs downing them. 

Avatar of MathWizKidA
chungle wrote:

AH HA!

 

So,...label someone a poor sport and boom.  This can now be gamed.  Nice one Chess.com.

 

 

@chungle, not to be rude or anything, but you probably should have read the message more closely.

It clearly says that "Your opponent has been warned for "abandoning the game" specifically, and therefore triggering that message cannot happen when you :tdown (chess.com emoji) a player.

Avatar of chungle
jdcannon wrote:

That message is unrelated to poor sport and only happens when we detect someone abandoned their game. You could never cause someone to get that warning by thumbs downing them. 

Not the warning.  The label: Poor Sport.  After every game one is presented with the option of up/down thumbing.  So, you're saying "poor sport" in the warning isn't related in any way shape or form to the option of labeling someone a "Poor Sport" after a game?

 

If not then the difference is confusing since the words are the same.  Please change the wording of the warning to not use "poor sports".  Thanks.

Avatar of ericthatwho

Mr.Mod Why ask "Poor Sport"

Is it because you really can't determine if someone abondined on purpose or not

Is it because you really can't define fair play etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'

Avatar of TickTricknTrack

To be honest I am wondering for quite some time what consequences this good/bad sport question hastongue.png I downvote them, if they use my lack of speed to flag me in drawn positions, other than that I vote them up. But I really have the impression, that this function has really no implications grin.png

On another famous server there used to be some kind of ranking in terms of sportmanship. I thought chess.com might use it for a similar purpose. But I guess nothing is planned in this direction?

Avatar of PrivateGiant
endgame347 wrote:
PrivateGiant wrote:

I am the type of chess.com player that never accept a rematch. I prefer different opponents in each and every game. Am I prone of getting a lot to "bad sport" score?

So if you lose you wouldn't want to play again to see how your opponent play's with the other colour?

I always accept rematches, I thinks its good sportsmanship to. Just my opinion.

Tendency if you rematch, there is a possibility opponent will use chess engine. And I just like different types of playing styles, and different openings and variations each and every game as chess training. In Swiss system tournaments, you meet a different opponent every game.

Avatar of ericthatwho

If otb someone was very interesting I might consider a rematch but I might change my mind.