What does mean, when a player refuse to rematch ?

refusing a rematch is not "non fair play"

don't pay attension to fantasy of some players

Personally, I don't refuse rematches in rated games... I just ignore them...  Is that better or worse than declining them?

refusing rematch is not an insult or disrespect ...
and this do not even require an explanation.
no one owes nothing

"no one owes nothing"

While it's true that online chess is just like casual "sex", it is still kind of creepy that people stop interacting with each other after the final move...  Even prostitutes smile at their customers...

Beerpatzer, they're leaving with money-- that's why they're smiling.

I started again to give rematches, and soon I was reminded why I didn´t like it before:

Situation 1:

I win - I was asked for a rematch

I win - I was asked for a rematch again

I win - I was asked for a rematch again 

I lost - 0.002 seconds later: "your oponnent has left the room"

Situation 2:

I win - I was asked for a rematch

I lost - I was asked for a rematch (I was thinking that he wanted a real long match)

I win - I was asked for a rematch

I win - I was asked for a rematch

I´m a totally winning position - "your oponnent has disconnected" (just when he saw that he is not going to level the match so easily).

your right, you have showing exactly what i mean. unfortunatly the atings are NOT real 

in the most of my games i will try to say hello but befor that my opponent usually leave the chat in 0.01 sec. lol

If I lose to someone, I get into a rage (sometimes ;) ) and won't want to rematch them because I'm annoyed. If I beat them, I'll only rematch them if it was because of some big blunder they made or if it was a really pleasant / enjoyable experience. Otherwise, no thanks, and I don't consider that rude.

i rematch if i like the player or if there a challeng to beat. i ddont rematch if mybrating is in danger

Me neither. I never want my brating in danger.

what does *it* mean

Rematches are for cheaters, sober people and grandmasters... I'm neither of them...

Yesterday or the day before I was playing a game, and I had to leave in a hurry, and I was like, Oh man, I'm going to be late for something very important, I hope I can finish this game!

I finally wrapped it up, managed to win the game.  And the guy immediately challenged me to a rematch.  I clicked out of there, jumped in the car, and went to my appointment.

What does it mean?  Nothing at all.

If someone wants to pat themselves on the back and call that "apologetics," go ahead.  If you believe the "real" reason I didn't accept the challenge was that I was scared, feel free.

The whole discussion is kind of silly.  Any "expert" rated chess player should beat me 9 times out of 10.

So what does it prove, one way or another, if someone at my crappy level beats me?  They won.  Big whoop.  We're both still crappy chess players.

I could see someone who is really excellent at chess really caring one way or another.  But I'm not good at chess.  If I lose, or win, it means almost nothing.  It's a pastime for me.

$.02

-zacarunius

i call the players that don't accept rematch 'win one and run'

what DOES it mean?

"What does mean, when a player refuse to rematch ?"

It means that they don't want to rematch.

AlCzervik wrote:

Me neither. I never want my brating in

danger.

Kayak21 wrote.

Me neither.

best answer itt

i don't want a brating