@binomine I'd think u were trolling but what troll goes through all the effort of adding images to just be wrong?
lol, that's because I did it upside down. opps.
@binomine I'd think u were trolling but what troll goes through all the effort of adding images to just be wrong?
lol, that's because I did it upside down. opps.
If white runs out of time.
FIDE: win for black
^ from your first post, surely you meant, if black runs out of time, FIDE: win for white... as black only has a king on the board
this kind of stuff leads to some funny issues ,
what if your opponent has two knights vs king? you cannot FORCE a checkmate but the king can helpmate itself there . similarly, two knights vs one which is an easy draw
- what if you add a pawn which interestingly often allows for the two knights to checkmate? (very difficult)
-what about bishop and knight vs opposite colored bishop where a checkmate is possible on that bishop's color corner? imagine a bishop on b7and king on g3, and your opponents king on h1, with knight on h2 and bishop on g1
the stupid part of this is that in a lot of these situations if you see two decent players achieve these types of situations, the proper result should be obvious .
Lots of bugs in the system due to the need for simplicity so that the computer can adjudicate the result.
For example, I ran out of time as black in the game below and was wrongly awarded a draw in my opinion as there is a possible win for white.
I’m also pretty sure that the position below would be awarded as a win for black on chess.com if white ran out of time
i personally think it's cause when one don't have enough material to win, and the other don't have enough time to win, so it's a draw because neither can win
#20
Black runs out of time: white wins: a series of legal moves exists that leads to checkmate.
White runs out of time: draw: no series of legal moves exists that leads to checkmate.