Why Abort?

I've aborted several times because my opponent would not move. I've waited 3-5 minutes, and no response from them.

 I agree with all that you say. I've also heard that changing an IP address is easy, but that was in C++ forum.

 Are you kidding me? I don't know what to call that except childish. Someone's nationality doesn't define them, and even if it did, it doesn't matter, we're here to play chess.

Where is the "harm" in aborting ?.

sorry, but this is a lame excuse…if you're playing in a real tournment and touch a piece, you must move it, you can't say, b-b-but I meant to move the other piece

This new abort policy seems a little paternalistic to me; calling it a “Fair Play Policy,” however, shows a talent for rhetoric. Have you ever thought of running for political office?

Yes, we are here to play chess but we also must have the right at choose our opponents as long we don't play tournaments. You must accept the fact that people are different and they have different opinions.

If you say I am not right, that means you are exactly like me - too radical.

you right, after I delete my accounts I could not stop crying for whole day

You're right, they call it “harming your opponent.” I see no harm.

try both.

Sparrow... I think all of gwn34's reasons are justifiable for aborting  games. It's only a chess game. Next thing you know, you will be telling me I shouldn't consider how a person looks, or their religon, or how much money they have, or their gender if I want to get married. Again, it is only a chess game, and it doesn't have the weight and consequences of governmental prejudices. 

What I want to point here is not the fact I have delete my account. I was given an example and you have take it as a STATEMENT???

So, for any reason a person should not be allowed to create as many users he want and I have given my solution on this. Now, because you have bothered me, I will delete my account again and create a new one. And I will keep doing this until something will be changed. Then, you will may not have the chance to read such "sad statements".

Hi, this is me again with a new user from another country. By the way, this should be also fixed.

I like to play 30 minute games.  If it takes me 15 minutes to move then so be it, but in the same game if it takes you 2 minutes then you win on time.  So i think its unfair for someone to want to make you move quickly if you are not ready.  You understand the time limit you have when you start the game.  To abort a game for anything, i think is unfair to your opponent.  If you don't want to wait or you have something to do; the only honorable thing to do is to resign.  Period.

 In what way "unfair" ?

 Then how is it "fair" to abort ?

There are situations where it's entirely understandable to abort.

It's certainly fair to allow aborts for a delayed start -- no longer an issue.

It's entirely understandable for someone to abort due to some kind of emergency.

I do not say that it is fair. I ask only in what way it is unfair.

Maybe you should add a feature to add an optional delay between a move and the move submission to server. This could be be a default value and override before the first move.

Sometimes I make a wrong move due to a drag and drop problem.

With this option I would be able to correct that move.

Indeed, but it happens a lot to me to move the correct piece to incorrect place due to drag and drop problems. for instance, e3 when I want e4.