Check Mate in 5


I think weird positions are OK, but things like two light-squared bishops makes the puzzle rather mediocre. The serious problem with the puzzle, though, is the fact that it is not a mate-in-five. 2...Kxg5 is a blunder that speeds up mate. There may still be a forced mate somehow within the next 20 moves, but 2...d4 or 2...e5 delays it for quite some time.
~TO
De-Lar:, well instead of moving the d5 pawn you need to move the e6 pawn, that will delay it for quiet a time...

Sorry, but I am not sure what a chess engine is... can you explain?

2...d4 or 2...e5 delays it for quite some time.
Naw it only delays it four more moves.
Wow, De-Lar, top notch! If you figured that out yourself, you should be proud of yourself. That is great analysis for a 1500.
I didn't look at it that long and did not spot the Queen sac, but at least my point stands that these moves delay mate longer than five.

I didn't expect it, but this position turned out to be quite interesting. First of all, there is De-Lar's Queen sacrifice for 2...d4. Another interesting point is that, in this line, 8.Nb3 also forces mate in nine, due to the numerous mate threats.
Spurred on by De-Lar's analysis, I actually discovered a forced mate-in-eight after 2...e5, by way of 3.Qxe5+! (I decided to try the same strategy) and 4.Be7! (taking away the last of the King's flight squares).

Sorry, but I am not sure what a chess engine is... can you explain?
He is just talking about a computer program that analyses positions for you.
On the off chance that you wanted my advice; I wholeheartedly disagree. Creating and solving puzzles is an excellent way to improve your analysis skills, which will help your game improve dramatically. If you get used to someone or something else doing this for you, you will not improve nearly as much. Spend the time to think everything out yourself. The 'skill' of chess is just thinking, after all.
Thanks!