Checkmate in 12 (Intermediate)
ummm actually there is a fault in this puzzle, its that if you take pawns i think its a faster mate... ummm so no taking pawns allowed aka queening ok? i really should make a problem that actually works shouldn't I?
i really should make a problem that actually works shouldn't I?
It would be a nice change of pace. 
it would... but it would be nice to help a novice puzzle maker instead of throw a lot of corrections at this face =P
it would... but it would be nice to help a novice puzzle maker instead of throw a lot of corrections at this face =P
Is supplying the correction to a puzzle not helping? What would you call it?
the feeling i get is throwing corrections in non-caring ways and argueing the right side everytime against me because im wrong every time doesn't help me alot.
your very plain
so you can say "sorry, but i think you missed this and that"
instead of:
your wrong. your puzzles wrong. you missed this and that. this is refuted by that
or as another example:
"this isn't very good though, im sure you can try better next time though =)" instead of:
your rubbish.
Which side of that do I appear on? I hope it's the "Sorry, I think you missed this and that" side of things... if it isn't then I apologise whole-heartedly! 
im not argueing now, im just saying you could be a LITTLE more careful with your text. there are a lot of another people who are more "emotional" (i mean "a little insult will make me mad emotional) than me.
Why do you even need to ask that? I'm the Nytik. I could respond to your post before you've made it, if I wanted to.
kk i accept your apologies anyway, but ill just warn you to type more carefully (your going to argue against this too i know). ok again im probably wrong, because you havn't been attacked back (don't take it that badly, i don't know another word for it) at yet i don't think (i don't look on your profile recent activities).
lol the Nytik. are you famous? i bet you go on every single topic subject.
maybe you could find a faster solution to the Daily Puzzle one day.
I don't mind if you think my posts were written with intent of degradation or harm, because internet posts lack a vital part of speech- tone of voice. Whatever I write is bound to be mis-interpreted by one person or another! 
But I can assure you, I never harbour any malicious intent.
Unless the member I'm talking to comes under the categories of troll, spammer or flamer. 
No, because the puzzles are of your own composition. It's not like you're flooding the forums with Polgar's 5334 puzzles, is it? At least you're trying, and as far as I'm concerned, that makes you better than 70% of the people who take up the precious forum space. 