It is good, but not that great, I reached 2750 with like 3K puzzles. It is important however that you actually learn from those puzzles and take the details of the positions in.
I hit 2600 puzzle rating, is that good?

Anyway. For life of me idk where they get some of the numbers from for the Puzzles. They cant claim its a medium or some 50 %ile of players who make or miss. No way. Weve all seen the easy ones thats little more then mate in 1 but they call it *1650* or somethin. If a puzzle like that had a rating for who makes or misses itd be about 400 hahaha. Idk where they get the number from
However, such a puzzle might have a high rating because it might be difficult to find, it they might have another tempting move which is wrong.
Like, they might give a free queen in an obvious way and a matter in one in an obscure way. Most people would take the free queen as they see it. They wouldn't think twice. In such a situation, the puzzle's rating is justified.

It's not very good. Here we get very high puzzle ratings. Go to some other sites and your puzzle rating is well below 2000. Here I have 3300, on lichess 2200, on ICC 2100, and on chesstempo 1600.

Good job. Let's test your theory.
Rook takes bishop; Q take rook; bishop takes knight

2600 is good, it usually means your tactical abilities are around 1600 rating. So, congratulations!
If you try to decrease your mistakes and use the tactical knowledge then you should reach 1600 in no time.
"2600 is good, it usually means your tactical abilities are around 1600 rating. So, congratulations!"
My puzzle rating is 2630 - has been over 2800 - but I have never beaten a 1600 rated player, ever.
I hit 3100 last month.