Mate in 1

Sort:
Avatar of SwissChess

Avatar of -waller-

??? There are only two possible ways to give check!

Avatar of oggo1001

That was easy.

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
oggo1001 wrote:

That was easy.


 If the puzzle is a mate in one, It's a safe bet it's not going to be Fischer level.

Avatar of doodinthemood
woodshover wrote:
oggo1001 wrote:

That was easy.


 If the puzzle is a mate in one, It's a safe bet it's not going to be Fischer level.


 You can have tricky mates in 1:

Avatar of Elubas

Those en passant ones are so stupid (even though they look cool). How do you know they played ...b5 last move?

Avatar of doodinthemood
Elubas wrote:

Those en passant ones are so stupid (even though they look cool). How do you know they played ...b5 last move?


 That's... kinda the point. You have to work out what their last move was, in order to know that en passant is valid.

Avatar of ollgam

not hard i guess problems like the one in reply might be the only tricky kind of 1-movers

Avatar of sdtmcn

A good puzzle.

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet

Nice.

Avatar of kingattack999

can someone help me? I can't see how the puzzle above is a mate in 1.

Avatar of kingattack999

wait is it: en passant with the back white pawn so it is mate with two pawns?

Avatar of TheGrobe
doodinthemood wrote:
Elubas wrote:

Those en passant ones are so stupid (even though they look cool). How do you know they played ...b5 last move?


 That's... kinda the point. You have to work out what their last move was, in order to know that en passant is valid.


They're especially good when it needs to be proven that it's the only possible last move (as is the case with this one).  I really enjoy retrograde analysis puzzles.

Avatar of kingattack999

so it is en passant?

Avatar of jedzz
Elubas wrote:

Those en passant ones are so stupid (even though they look cool). How do you know they played ...b5 last move?


 You have to look at black's other pieces and see that there is no other move than ... b5 that leads to that position. Here's the diagram again.

There are no empty squares in the rook or bishop's range, so we know that neither just moved. Did black just play ... Ne6-c7? No -- on e6 the knight gives check, so white would have needed to move his king on the previous move.

So what about the king? Obviously, it can't have been on b6, where the two kings would be adjacent. It may have been sitting on b7, checked by the pawn on a6. But then how did that pawn get there? Both a5 and b5 are occupied, so it can't have just moved or captured to that square.

That leaves black's pawn. Maybe it moved from b6 to b5? Yes, except that it attacks the white king on b6, so with black to move, that was an illegal position.

Therefore, we know that black's only legal move was ... b7-b5, allowing white to play axb6 e.p. #

Avatar of briles24
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of Guest8118589702
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.