i cant see a problem with it, but when the computer plays, it always wants to do the mate in 5, but when i verse the CPU, i get it in 4. weird.
Mate in 5 or 4?
1. Rh1, leading to:
1. ... Kh5 2. Rg1 Kh4 3. Rh6#
1. ... Kg4 2. Rg6+ Kh5 3. Rg8 Kh6 4. Rh1#
1. ... Kh4 2. Rg6 Kh5 transposing to the previous variation.
Thus mate in 4.
Perhaps they use the mate in 5 to illustrate the theme rather than finding the quickest mate.
1. Rh1, leading to:
1. ... Kh5 2. Rg1 Kh4 3. Rh6#
1. ... Kg4 2. Rg6+ Kh5 3. Rg8 Kh6 4. Rh1#
1. ... Kh4 2. Rg6 Kh5 transposing to the previous variation.
Thus mate in 4.
Perhaps they use the mate in 5 to illustrate the theme rather than finding the quickest mate.
Hi Searching4Bobby,
Sorry to confuse, hence, ConfusedConfucius; I meant to write, 3. Rfg1 instead of Rag1.
Phmilet, maybe you're right now that I think about it. A previous lesson was on having the rooks work like a "ladder" to force the King to a mate. But, it would have been nice if they had made a notation on this and indicate that although this example lesson could be mated in 4, 5 was chosen to illustrate the "ladder" effect of Rooks.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Hi all, just purchased the most recent copy of Chessmaster, XI: Grandmaster Edition for the PC. As I was going through one of their tutorials, Academy-Josh Waitzkin, I came across a lesson where they're indicating a mate in 5. I say there's actually a mate in 4 and need your confirmation. Here is the position:
White has a Rook on a1 and b6 and a White King on a8. Black has his King on g5. Their solution is 1. White Rb4.. 2. White Ra5..,etc. hence mate in 5. My solution: 1. Rf1.. 2. Rg6.. 3. Rag1 4. Rh6 mate. Please confirm. Thanks!