i cant see a problem with it, but when the computer plays, it always wants to do the mate in 5, but when i verse the CPU, i get it in 4. weird.
Mate in 5 or 4?
1. Rh1, leading to:
1. ... Kh5 2. Rg1 Kh4 3. Rh6#
1. ... Kg4 2. Rg6+ Kh5 3. Rg8 Kh6 4. Rh1#
1. ... Kh4 2. Rg6 Kh5 transposing to the previous variation.
Thus mate in 4.
Perhaps they use the mate in 5 to illustrate the theme rather than finding the quickest mate.

1. Rh1, leading to:
1. ... Kh5 2. Rg1 Kh4 3. Rh6#
1. ... Kg4 2. Rg6+ Kh5 3. Rg8 Kh6 4. Rh1#
1. ... Kh4 2. Rg6 Kh5 transposing to the previous variation.
Thus mate in 4.
Perhaps they use the mate in 5 to illustrate the theme rather than finding the quickest mate.
Hi Searching4Bobby,
Sorry to confuse, hence, ConfusedConfucius; I meant to write, 3. Rfg1 instead of Rag1.
Phmilet, maybe you're right now that I think about it. A previous lesson was on having the rooks work like a "ladder" to force the King to a mate. But, it would have been nice if they had made a notation on this and indicate that although this example lesson could be mated in 4, 5 was chosen to illustrate the "ladder" effect of Rooks.
Hi all, just purchased the most recent copy of Chessmaster, XI: Grandmaster Edition for the PC. As I was going through one of their tutorials, Academy-Josh Waitzkin, I came across a lesson where they're indicating a mate in 5. I say there's actually a mate in 4 and need your confirmation. Here is the position:
White has a Rook on a1 and b6 and a White King on a8. Black has his King on g5. Their solution is 1. White Rb4.. 2. White Ra5..,etc. hence mate in 5. My solution: 1. Rf1.. 2. Rg6.. 3. Rag1 4. Rh6 mate. Please confirm. Thanks!