Yeah, there are a few, it's frequently used as a defenisive thing to create stalemate positions.
Don't go away, I'll see if I can find some....
Yeah, there are a few, it's frequently used as a defenisive thing to create stalemate positions.
Don't go away, I'll see if I can find some....
The reason you don't see many puzzles where a bishop underpromotion is required compared to knight underpromotion puzzles is because the bishop's movement is not unique while the knight's is (of course the queen can move like a bishop). Situations where a bishop is required rather than a queen are very rare. You would only do it to avoid stalemating your opponent I believe.
Here is a great example:
Rooperi: black can just take the bishop and checkmate white!!
Look again....
1 g8(B)+ RxB 2 hxR(Q)+ and white wins
Rooperi: black can just take the bishop and checkmate white!!
Look again....
1 g8(B)+ RxB 2 hxR(Q)+ and white wins
I was looking at yours upside down :p I'm REALLY tired lol. Should get off chess.com perhaps..
Without the g2 pawn it wouldn't be so "easy"
1. g8Q+ Kc2 2. Qxb8 Qxb8+ 3. Kg7 Qe5+ 4. Kg8 Qg5+ 5. Kh8 Qg6 6. g4 Qf7 7. g5 Qf8#
post #6 - Why not 1.a8(Q)+ Kf4 2.Bd6+?
fine, then... throw some white pawns on the board so that it works :P
I was setting it up from memory
Here is a puzzle where you need to promote to a bishop for a win. Check the move list to see what would happen if white promoted to a queen.
My favorite examplse of underpromotions are solutions to the so-called "Babson Task."
I had a thread about it here, but I will repost the best of them:
We just saw a puzzle where a pawn is promoted to a knight. I remember seeing one where the promotion is to a rook to avoid stalemate. Does anyone know of a puzzle where the correct promotion is to a bishop?