Your puzzles fly in the face of so many puzzlemaking principals. Obviously winning positions don't need to be puzzles, and when there are two winning moves you just arbitrarily choose one to be correct. These are semi-interesting positions, but don't delude yourself by calling these puzzles.
Thankyou for your feedback. I do understand the shortcomings of my "puzzles". However, I also think there is some benefit to them because they contain tactics that require a good level of calculation to find the winning tactic. Many of these tactics requires you to find a winning (great) move or a sacrifice (brilliant) move. Yes, in some positions, there may be two or three excellent moves to continue developing. But, other times, one move is the only move that maintains your advantage. That move might require a high level of calculation. My "puzzles" provide those opportunities to develop your calculation skills to find tactics like forks, pins, skewers and sacrifices.
Your puzzles fly in the face of so many puzzlemaking principals. Obviously winning positions don't need to be puzzles, and when there are two winning moves you just arbitrarily choose one to be correct. These are semi-interesting positions, but don't delude yourself by calling these puzzles.