I also like arguing; I'm a debater and don't get to attack my opponents in an actual debate like this ;).
I notice you've only answered one of my points in the post 66. Without proof or explanations of any sort.
White to play and gain a winning advantage
Sort:
You must be a terrible chess coach if you value ratings more than truth.
Yereslov wrote:
crtexxx wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
crtexxx wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
And how am I trolling by posting accurate analysis?
Or maybe I am a troll because I don't automatically bow down to authority... who knows.
My analysis is accurate.
I did not claim "White to play and win."
I said "White to play and gain a winning advantage."
No, i don't get the meaning and even an idiot like yourself knows it. You can see my other posts clearly. That's not all.
---
Once again, it's not just [(not yours, once again!) Houdini's] lengthy, perfect analysis that comes with no comments nor any explanation of any kind at all.
For sure, you bow down to Houdini's advice instantly. Why? Houdini can't talk to you so it can't communicate anything other than letters and numbers and dots.
The puzzle is especially bad, since there are clearly variations from the solution. This is the instant puzzle killer. The fact that the solution is cold and lifeless makes it even worse. No beautiful sacs or brilliant ideas, just some useless engine analysis that is impossible to comprehend and will increase your playing strength by zero (wait, actually it is -.02384 points).
You also ignored my world open problem. You simply can't do it without your little engine buddy to help you along ;).
You seem to like my attention, since you have replied to every thread I have posted in a span of a few seconds.
And instead of contrubuting somehow, you aim for insults.
Don't you have better things to do?
Yeah I do...as a free chess coach before school starts. But the nature of the work allows me to multitask and arrogant fools like u.
A nice diversion from argument at hand, which you know you have lost.
"you seem to like my attention"-I do since your arguments are totally weak and your posts are hilarious.
Only someone extremely insecure would be this active in insulting someone.
I have absolutely no effect on your life whatsoever, yet you bother to start some kind of war?
Seems a bit pathetic.
I don't value ratings more than truth ( i never stated so); you simply don't know what the truth is: please explain the truth to me: in english please: no numbers.:).
No, someone who likes to argue about actual points would also do it. By the way, I'm not insecure. My pic is on skype for everyone to see 
, my name is the same, so check me up. Do you have a pic you would like to share? Let's exchange ;).
crtexxx wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
crtexxx wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
crtexxx wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
And how am I trolling by posting accurate analysis?
Or maybe I am a troll because I don't automatically bow down to authority... who knows.
My analysis is accurate.
I did not claim "White to play and win."
I said "White to play and gain a winning advantage."
No, i don't get the meaning and even an idiot like yourself knows it. You can see my other posts clearly. That's not all.
---
Once again, it's not just [(not yours, once again!) Houdini's] lengthy, perfect analysis that comes with no comments nor any explanation of any kind at all.
For sure, you bow down to Houdini's advice instantly. Why? Houdini can't talk to you so it can't communicate anything other than letters and numbers and dots.
The puzzle is especially bad, since there are clearly variations from the solution. This is the instant puzzle killer. The fact that the solution is cold and lifeless makes it even worse. No beautiful sacs or brilliant ideas, just some useless engine analysis that is impossible to comprehend and will increase your playing strength by zero (wait, actually it is -.02384 points).
You also ignored my world open problem. You simply can't do it without your little engine buddy to help you along ;).
You seem to like my attention, since you have replied to every thread I have posted in a span of a few seconds.
And instead of contrubuting somehow, you aim for insults.
Don't you have better things to do?
Yeah I do...as a free chess coach before school starts. But the nature of the work allows me to multitask and arrogant fools like u.
A nice diversion from argument at hand, which you know you have lost.
"you seem to like my attention"-I do since your arguments are totally weak and your posts are hilarious.
Only someone extremely insecure would be this active in insulting someone.
I have absolutely no effect on your life whatsoever, yet you bother to start some kind of war?
Seems a bit pathetic.
I don't value ratings more than truth ( i never stated so); you simply don't know what the truth is: please explain the truth to me: in english please: no numbers.:).
No, someone who likes to argue about actual points would also do it. By the way, I'm not insecure. My pic is on skype for everyone to see , my name is the same, so check me up. Do you have a pic you would like to share? Let's exchange ;).
I'm not fond of revealing private information to strangers.
crtexxx wrote:
I also like arguing; I'm a debater and don't get to attack my opponents in an actual debate like this ;).
I notice you've only answered one of my points in the post 66. Without proof or explanations of any sort.
I posted diagrams.
Sharing and opening up greatly increases security and self-esteem. Trust me, I know it ;). I'll go first: I go to WJHS. That was pretty private, wasn't it?
Anyways, bye now. I've had my fun and I'll leave you alone until I see another ridiculous post that makes me really mad (another arrogant one, like the one with the "I'm very critical" or whatever it was).
Have a good time :). You too Houdini ;D!
pfren wrote:
I'm pretty sure nobody gives a damn about your private information, sir.
Well, when my name pops up on ChessBase in a few years, remember me.
pfren wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
Well, when my name pops up on ChessBase in a few years, remember me.
As a reseller? Not unlikely.
No, as a grandmaster. The reason you are stuck as a IM is because you are too lifeless.
I have seen your games. They are a borefest. You are never willing to make it exciting.
If I became an IM only to play such lifeless and colorless chess, I would just quit.
Yereslov wrote:
pfren wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
Well, when my name pops up on ChessBase in a few years, remember me.
As a reseller? Not unlikely.
No, as a grandmaster. The reason you are stuck as a IM is because you are too lifeless.
I have seen your games. They are a borefest. You are never willing to make it exciting.
lol
Mainline_Novelty wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
pfren wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
Well, when my name pops up on ChessBase in a few years, remember me.
As a reseller? Not unlikely.
No, as a grandmaster. The reason you are stuck as a IM is because you are too lifeless.
I have seen your games. They are a borefest. You are never willing to make it exciting.
lol
You "Lol" because it's true.
Show me a decent game by Pfren.
Yereslov wrote:
Mainline_Novelty wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
pfren wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
Well, when my name pops up on ChessBase in a few years, remember me.
As a reseller? Not unlikely.
No, as a grandmaster. The reason you are stuck as a IM is because you are too lifeless.
I have seen your games. They are a borefest. You are never willing to make it exciting.
lol
You "Lol" because it's true.
Show me a decent game by Pfren.
If you're so much better, then show me a decent game of yours...
Oh wow. This guy's having a go at pfren now?! Yereslov; stop!, you're out of your depth.
As to the puzzle, the "Solution" didn't seem to make a whole lot of sense considering there were multiple moves that could have been played to gain an advantage.
Yereslov, maybe you should focus on taking people's advice rather than just insulting them, listen to people and you'll find they've given you something, if nothing more than just something to chew on.
thecheesykid wrote:
Oh wow. This guy's having a go at pfren now?! Yereslov; stop!, you're out of your depth.
As to the puzzle, the "Solution" didn't seem to make a whole lot of sense considering there were multiple moves that could have been played to gain an advantage.
Yereslov, maybe you should focus on taking people's advice rather than just insulting them, listen to people and you'll find they've given you something, if nothing more than just something to chew on.
Really? There were multiple moves?
I already checked them out, hence why the options are limited.
Here, give me a variation. I will give you the refutation.
A go at Pfren?
Pfren is pretty average for an IM titled played.
Yereslov wrote:
A go at Pfren?
Pfren is pretty average for an IM titled played.
Even if he were weak for an IM, that'd still be close to infinitely better than you...
This elitism is extremely annoying in chess. The accuracy of a move has nothing to do with how high rated the opponent is.
Mainline_Novelty wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
A go at Pfren?
Pfren is pretty average for an IM titled played.
Even if he were weak for an IM, that'd still be close to infinitely better than you...
That's funny, because I understand chess on a level you never will.
And how am I trolling by posting accurate analysis?
Or maybe I am a troll because I don't automatically bow down to authority... who knows.
My analysis is accurate.
I did not claim "White to play and win."
I said "White to play and gain a winning advantage."
No, i don't get the meaning and even an idiot like yourself knows it. You can see my other posts clearly. That's not all.
---
Once again, it's not just [(not yours, once again!) Houdini's] lengthy, perfect analysis that comes with no comments nor any explanation of any kind at all.
For sure, you bow down to Houdini's advice instantly. Why? Houdini can't talk to you so it can't communicate anything other than letters and numbers and dots.
The puzzle is especially bad, since there are clearly variations from the solution. This is the instant puzzle killer. The fact that the solution is cold and lifeless makes it even worse. No beautiful sacs or brilliant ideas, just some useless engine analysis that is impossible to comprehend and will increase your playing strength by zero (wait, actually it is -.02384 points).
You also ignored my world open problem. You simply can't do it without your little engine buddy to help you along ;).
You seem to like my attention, since you have replied to every thread I have posted in a span of a few seconds.
And instead of contrubuting somehow, you aim for insults.
Don't you have better things to do?
Yeah I do...as a free chess coach before school starts. But the nature of the work allows me to multitask and arrogant fools like u.
A nice diversion from argument at hand, which you know you have lost.
"you seem to like my attention"-I do since your arguments are totally weak and your posts are hilarious.
Only someone extremely insecure would be this active in insulting someone.
I have absolutely no effect on your life whatsoever, yet you bother to start some kind of war?
Seems a bit pathetic.