another tasteless thread
Sort:
What is going on here ! Yet again another disgusting thread is allowed to appear on the of topic forums, this time over the size of a persons penis . People who post such filth, should be banned, and the thread deleted,and not just locked
cottonsock wrote:
What is going on here ! Yet again another disgusting thread is allowed to appear on the of topic forums, this time over the size of a persons penis . People who post such filth, should be banned, and the thread deleted,and not just locked
Judging from what I've seen since I joined, it's probably gonna get worse with the feeble monitoring here.
Moderators do not have the power to delete threads. They try not to take action specifically in off topic, Since most of the people are untouchble by premium, and since most threads aren't terrible. So for the most part off-topic miscreants are untouched until erik allows moderatos to ban and mute premium members. Since they do not want to bother staff with bullying ad swearing they just lock the topics. And warn the members to no avail. Since they have premium and they know it. Since staff does not have the time to look at a member's post for the past month, they remain untouched.
That's why in 2 years and chess.com can hire me,I'm gonna ask erik about it.
They don't delete it because it serves as an example of what will NOT be accepted, in case other new members we're thinking about it.
Untouchable by premium,.. Ha ah ah.
Not true, lots of paying members are banned. They get away with a bit more, but a plain violation of rules will result in a thread lock or worse.
Not true, lots of paying members are banned. They get away with a bit more, but a plain violation of rules will result in a thread lock or worse.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
They don't delete it because it serves as an example of what will NOT be accepted, in case other new members we're thinking about it.
#10,
OGK, look at your previous behaviour and reputation on this site.
I doubt they will hire you for another while.
Just tell them now. Anyway they've almost certainly worked out all this before, you know, as this is their job and they spend lots of time in it, I think they understand the system better then you
OGK, look at your previous behaviour and reputation on this site.
I doubt they will hire you for another while.
Just tell them now. Anyway they've almost certainly worked out all this before, you know, as this is their job and they spend lots of time in it, I think they understand the system better then you
VicountVonJames wrote:
Untouchable by premium,.. Ha ah ah.
Not true, lots of paying members are banned. They get away with a bit more, but a plain violation of rules will result in a thread lock or worse.
Not true, lots of paying members are banned. They get away with a bit more, but a plain violation of rules will result in a thread lock or worse.
OGK; Didn't mean to be nasty to you the other day in my thread for mods. I don't mind talking, just not in THAT thread.
VicountVonJames wrote:
#10,
OGK, look at your previous behaviour and reputation on this site.
I doubt they will hire you for another while.
Just tell them now. Anyway they've almost certainly worked out all this before, you know, as this is their job and they spend lots of time in it, I think they understand the system better then you
OGK, look at your previous behaviour and reputation on this site.
I doubt they will hire you for another while.
Just tell them now. Anyway they've almost certainly worked out all this before, you know, as this is their job and they spend lots of time in it, I think they understand the system better then you
If you had not noticed then fine It was my sister by the way getting me back for getting her punished across multiple websites.
In fairness more or less everyone has used the excuse "my sister did it" at some point. Weather you are telling the truth, or not, the above statement is a fact. I know I have used it in my younger years.
So you also deny more recent behaviours and your reaction when mark was insinuating you were another member? (Not this version, a different one). For example, I doubt my behaviour has been "good" enough to ever grant me a mod position, yours has been no better.
So you also deny more recent behaviours and your reaction when mark was insinuating you were another member? (Not this version, a different one). For example, I doubt my behaviour has been "good" enough to ever grant me a mod position, yours has been no better.
Recent behviour of Poking mark for him to rage acrss multiple threads because it is fun? Nah that is just because if he is gonna hate me for no reason anyways migt as well get fun out of it. Also it is october when I read that he had called her 2Q1C from looking back in the forums for dirt on her he did that in september, Apparently David got involved so I don't know. I was not even sure why it was a insult until I read up on it in recent thread So. He is how he is, only about 3 people do not believe me so unless you don't.