Forums

Can Science Disprove a Miracle?

Sort:
Avatar of Deadmanparty
Deadmanparty
Apr 22, 2023
0
#61

Just to be clear, I am not saying the Biblical account is true. My question is if science can prove it wrong.

If God created a world and universe with age built into it just as Adam was created with age, how could science measure any age?

Avatar of USArmyParatrooper
USArmyParatrooper
Apr 22, 2023
0
#62
Deadmanparty wrote:

Just to be clear, I am not saying the Biblical account is true. My question is if science can prove it wrong.

If God created a world and universe with age built into it just as Adam was created with age, how could science measure any age?

It's *been* answered, and yes it can and has. For example, the Biblical account shows plants existing before the sun and the other stars. The Bible claims God made man in their present form, but biological evolution proves that to be false. That's just two examples, and their are more.

Basically God would have to have gone to enormous lengths to deliberately fool us into thinking the Biblical account of creation is wrong.

Avatar of USArmyParatrooper
USArmyParatrooper
Apr 22, 2023
0
#63
Lincoy3304 wrote:
I would argue about this, but it seems like this thread is going to be locked anytime so there’s no point. One comment I will make though is directed to post #28
I think you are mistaken. Science can only offer natural explanations of natural phenomena. That does not mean those explanations are the only way those so called “miracles” could have happened. A supernatural explanation could be offered. The natural explanation cannot rule out the supernatural explanation without evidence against the supernatural explanation. In the same way, the supernatural explanation cannot rule out the natural explanation without evidence against the natural explanation.
All in all, there could be two explanations of an event, and without evidence against either one we cannot rule each one out.

If person A says a thing was caused by God, and science discovers a natural explanation as the real cause, person A's claim has been falsified.

Avatar of Lincoy3304
Lincoy3304
Apr 22, 2023
0
#64
Maybe I’m misunderstanding falsification. I’m probably taking it too strong. Do you mean that it’s wrong or it’s equally likely or less likely that it’s wrong compared to an alternative?
Avatar of WTFrickenA
WTFrickenA
Apr 22, 2023
0
#65

The scientist could only come up with the realization that The Son Of God simply created wine from water, but anything else only verifies their ignorance.

Avatar of WTFrickenA
WTFrickenA
Apr 22, 2023
0
#66

....and their lmao theories 🤣

Avatar of WTFrickenA
WTFrickenA
Apr 22, 2023
0
#67
chessterd5 wrote:

I will answer the question in the title. " Can science disprove a miracle?"

The word miracle is worldly, and means TO BE RECEPTIVE TO Truth. Receptivity To Truth

Avatar of Deadmanparty
Deadmanparty
Apr 23, 2023
0
#68
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
Deadmanparty wrote:

Just to be clear, I am not saying the Biblical account is true. My question is if science can prove it wrong.

If God created a world and universe with age built into it just as Adam was created with age, how could science measure any age?

It's *been* answered, and yes it can and has. For example, the Biblical account shows plants existing before the sun and the other stars. The Bible claims God made man in their present form, but biological evolution proves that to be false. That's just two examples, and their are more.

Basically God would have to have gone to enormous lengths to deliberately fool us into thinking the Biblical account of creation is wrong.

So you assume that God did not create a planet with a fossil record in place.

Avatar of Fisikhad
Fisikhad
Apr 23, 2023
0
#69
Let’s think this the other way around

I turned wood to metal,you inspect it and its metal,can you explain the transformation?
Avatar of Deadmanparty
Deadmanparty
Apr 23, 2023
0
#70

Other way around is what you get in pretty much any other thread. Why not be original?