RoninUnleashed wrote:
Lichess ratings are way inflated. Im Luke a 1250 here and like a 1450-1500 there I think...
Yep, same, if I want to be a 1900 player I could just play at lichess.
Chess.com vs lichess.org
Sort:
Aug 27, 2021
0
#43
same old question. probably this will be asked forever.
yeah free unlimited puzzles on one side video lessons on the other. premoves takes 0.1s etc. forum is better (?) on one. one is free.
thing is you are member of both.. no matter which one is better or worse
Aug 27, 2021
0
#44
They are both good sites, was on lichess too in the past, I tend to play almost exclusively on chess.com tough. I'm a creature of habit and I'm used to the interface here.
Aug 28, 2021
0
#45
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
Atharv9s escreveu:
which users will win?
of Chess.com
or others
Lichess community is 20 times better
Also you need to sell your soul to chess.com so you can use it properly
I disagree, lichess community and chess.com community are relatively the same, but chess.com beats lichess because you can do much more things in clubs and communities.
I disagree, lichess community and chess.com community are relatively the same
…what?
In a way ofcourse.
Lol stop trolling.
nah lol
You admitted you were trolling? Enjoy your mute.
no i told i dont troll lol
Then why didn’t you say “I’m not trolling”?
Chess com is way better if we're talking about included features. But I can change my opinion if they'll decide to add new variants on non-square boards.
Aug 28, 2021
0
#47
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
ritterfork wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
Atharv9s escreveu:
which users will win?
of Chess.com
or others
Lichess community is 20 times better
Also you need to sell your soul to chess.com so you can use it properly
I disagree, lichess community and chess.com community are relatively the same, but chess.com beats lichess because you can do much more things in clubs and communities.
I disagree, lichess community and chess.com community are relatively the same
…what?
In a way ofcourse.
Lol stop trolling.
nah lol
You admitted you were trolling? Enjoy your mute.
no i told i dont troll lol
You literally posted a forum like
aM I fAmOuS?
as for lichess vs cc, cc is better. The interface, analysis, and puzzles are better. But lichess is not trash; it provides very good learning tools for free.
What learning tools?
Lichess's learning tools arent actually great. They just at first show us the moves and then give us challenges. Take for example the Greek Gift sacrifice. It first gave the theory ( in text ) and then gave the challenges. Meanwhile chess.com gives video explanation as well challenges. Chess.com is far ahead in terms of learning tool than lichess
where is firouja now?
Lichess has a horrible playerbase for bullet.
Sep 22, 2021
0
#51
Lichess.org = 76 %
Chess.com = 24 %
I have tried them Lichess.org wins
Sep 22, 2021
0
#52
I’m on both, and I would recommend playing at both. They both have so much to offer. My name is the same both places.
hoodoothere wrote:
If 100 players from lichess, rated say 1200ish, played 100 1200ish players from chess.com, the chess.com players would win more games because lichess ratings are inflated.
The ratings are different in different websites, yes.
If 100 players from lichess, rated say 2600, played 100 2600 players from chess.com, the lichess players would win more games.
It means nothing.
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
stagomon wrote:
hoodoothere wrote:
If 100 players from lichess, rated say 1200ish, played 100 1200ish players from chess.com, the chess.com players would win more games because lichess ratings are inflated.
The ratings are different in different websites, yes.
If 100 players from lichess, rated say 2600, played 100 2600 players from chess.com, the lichess players would win more games.
It means nothing.
Dude wrong! Everything lower than 2400 lichess chess.com would beat like 2000 lichess would be crushed by 2000 chess.com, heck 1800 here can draw a 2200 there. 2400 lichess vs 2400 rapid would probably be a tie, if chess.com doesn't win.
Your lack of understanding is astounding. Did I say 2400?
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Lichess is trash.
I guess you are not there so it is not trash
Besides, the entire argument of yours is incredibly illogical. Is Antigua more educated than all other countries because their 5 year olds start school earlier, so they are "smarter" than other 5 year olds? Different ratings on both platforms doesn't change the skill of the player.
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
stagomon wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
stagomon wrote:
hoodoothere wrote:
If 100 players from lichess, rated say 1200ish, played 100 1200ish players from chess.com, the chess.com players would win more games because lichess ratings are inflated.
The ratings are different in different websites, yes.
If 100 players from lichess, rated say 2600, played 100 2600 players from chess.com, the lichess players would win more games.
It means nothing.
Dude wrong! Everything lower than 2400 lichess chess.com would beat like 2000 lichess would be crushed by 2000 chess.com, heck 1800 here can draw a 2200 there. 2400 lichess vs 2400 rapid would probably be a tie, if chess.com doesn't win.
Your lack of understanding is astounding. Did I say 2400?
Your lack of understanding is just hilarious. I was explaining everything lower than 2400, and I gave an example. 2600 lichess vs. 2600 chess.com would probably be a tie.
My only point is to give an example of an exception to your twisted logic. Yet you still somehow are so dense that you don't understand and continue arguing with those illogical remarks.
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
stagomon wrote:
Besides, the entire argument of yours is incredibly illogical. Is Antigua more educated than all other countries because their 5 year olds start school earlier, so they are "smarter" than other 5 year olds? Different ratings on both platforms doesn't change the skill of the player.
How old are you? Players on lichess start at 1500 and use a different rating system than chess.com. Players at chess.com start at 1200, and use a different rating that lichess.org.
Likely older than you. FINALLY you admit it. Yes! That is correct! So why compare ?? Its like comparing apples to oranges.
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
which users will win?
of Chess.com
or others
Lichess community is 20 times better
Also you need to sell your soul to chess.com so you can use it properly
I disagree, lichess community and chess.com community are relatively the same, but chess.com beats lichess because you can do much more things in clubs and communities.
I disagree, lichess community and chess.com community are relatively the same
…what?
In a way ofcourse.
Lol stop trolling.
nah lol
You admitted you were trolling? Enjoy your mute.