Controversial Topic (Creation vs Evolution 2?)

Sort:
Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
checkmatemark04 wrote:

God is powerful enough, but he will not force any human to make a choice. The choice is up to you.

I was waiting to say this.

Showing himself up is not forcing anybody and it'd be very good evidence he exists.

Well, I’ve run out of ideas, so I’m gonna be a. chicken for now, bye, just be forewarned.

Avatar of Metar_Taf
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
HolographWars wrote:
Ginarook wrote:

You do your best..don't you

I am done now, before I ruin my arguments with ad hominem like you did.

 My irony meter just exploded, Mr. “where did you go to school?“

That is not as hominem. It is questioning your base intelligence. It’s lije saying, “We shouldn’t trust Sam, as he has been known to lie a lot.”

So it’s not an ad hominem, it’s only you trying to discredit the person instead of refuting the argument. lol 🤦‍♂️ 

You just contradicted yourself.

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
USArmyParatrooper escribió:
HolographWars wrote:

Have you all set on agreement that God is not evil, or do you disobey Einstein?

Einstein did NOT believe in a personal god. And if he did, YES, I would disagree with Einstein.

He believed in Espinoza's God.

That’s it. (Unfollows) 

May God one day give you peace.

Did my mispelling of "Spinoza" tick you off that much or are you simply willfully ignorant?

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
checkmatemark04 escribió:

If people will open their eyes, God has put proof all around us. You yourself is proof of an intelligent Creator. But people have shut their eyes from seeing and their ears from hearing the truth.

 

 

Sorry bro, the "intelligent design" argument has been busted and has remained so for decades.

Who is this guy? What is his expertise?

That's not relevant.

Avatar of USArmyParatrooper

 

@HolographWars, at this point it’s clear you’re just trolling. Which is understandable. It’s the extent of which you’re actually able to contribute.

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
checkmatemark04 wrote:

God is powerful enough, but he will not force any human to make a choice. The choice is up to you.

I was waiting to say this.

Showing himself up is not forcing anybody and it'd be very good evidence he exists.

Well, I’ve run out of ideas, so I’m gonna be a. chicken for now, bye, just be forewarned.

This must be the third time you said you were leaving and here you are.

Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
checkmatemark04 escribió:

If people will open their eyes, God has put proof all around us. You yourself is proof of an intelligent Creator. But people have shut their eyes from seeing and their ears from hearing the truth.

 

 

Sorry bro, the "intelligent design" argument has been busted and has remained so for decades.

Who is this guy? What is his expertise?

That's not relevant.

A meteorologist enters a court room and testified about forensic science. 

Avatar of Metar_Taf
USArmyParatrooper wrote:

 

@HolographWars, at this point it’s clear you’re just trolling.  Which is understandable. It’s the extent of which you’re actually able to contribute.

I am known on Chess.com for trolling. Thank you. 😀

Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
checkmatemark04 wrote:

God is powerful enough, but he will not force any human to make a choice. The choice is up to you.

I was waiting to say this.

Showing himself up is not forcing anybody and it'd be very good evidence he exists.

Well, I’ve run out of ideas, so I’m gonna be a. chicken for now, bye, just be forewarned.

This must be the third time you said you were leaving and here you are.

Trolllllll

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
checkmatemark04 escribió:

If people will open their eyes, God has put proof all around us. You yourself is proof of an intelligent Creator. But people have shut their eyes from seeing and their ears from hearing the truth.

 

 

Sorry bro, the "intelligent design" argument has been busted and has remained so for decades.

Who is this guy? What is his expertise?

That's not relevant.

A meteorologist enters a court room and testified about forensic science. 

We are talking fallacies here, you don't need to be a logician to know them and identify them.

 

As a matter of fact, you are just using a fallacy, ad hominem.

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
Ginarook escribió:
HolographWars wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:

 

@HolographWars, at this point it’s clear you’re just trolling.  Which is understandable. It’s the extent of which you’re actually able to contribute.

I am known on Chess.com for trolling. Thank you. 😀

No, lets be fair, you are very good at the following :

1. Parroting bible quotes

2. Making Grandiose and untrue statements with no evidence at all

3. Being simply wrong about many things,such as animals experiencing emotion

4. Ignoring the evidence for things such as my above point

5.Not knowing what Ad Hominem actually means

6.Making multiple false statements that you are leaving

 

So yes, you probably are a troll, but sadly not a very good one

He's good at being dumb, that's the upshot.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

Reported.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

As if you weren't mean...

Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

As if you weren't mean...

Have any quotes? 

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

As if you weren't mean...

Have any quotes? 

"It is bad simply cause, where did you go to school? 🙄 "

Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
Ginarook escribió:
HolographWars wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:

 

@HolographWars, at this point it’s clear you’re just trolling.  Which is understandable. It’s the extent of which you’re actually able to contribute.

I am known on Chess.com for trolling. Thank you. 😀

No, lets be fair, you are very good at the following :

1. Parroting bible quotes

2. Making Grandiose and untrue statements with no evidence at all

3. Being simply wrong about many things,such as animals experiencing emotion

4. Ignoring the evidence for things such as my above point

5.Not knowing what Ad Hominem actually means

6.Making multiple false statements that you are leaving

 

So yes, you probably are a troll, but sadly not a very good one

He's good at being dumb, that's the upshot.

That quite crosses the line here. Have I said anything like this to you? Quote the post number.

Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

As if you weren't mean...

Have any quotes? 

"It is bad simply cause, where did you go to school? 🙄 "

That is background criticism, not insulting deliberately for evil intent.

Avatar of Prometheus_Fuschs
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

As if you weren't mean...

Have any quotes? 

"It is bad simply cause, where did you go to school? 🙄 "

That is background criticism, not insulting deliberately for evil intent.

It is an insult, it is also criticism, it's both.

Avatar of Metar_Taf
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
HolographWars escribió:

#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.

As if you weren't mean...

Have any quotes? 

"It is bad simply cause, where did you go to school? 🙄 "

That is background criticism, not insulting deliberately for evil intent.

It is an insult, it is also criticism, it's both.

It is the latter, but not the former. It is attacking the basis of where claims come from.

This forum topic has been locked