I knew you are dumb enough to not get it . I will first explain the X and Y thing .Â
X= You interrelate statements according to your convenience . (This was my statement)Â
Your response = So what ? You want me to (interrelate imaginary statements which are not even part of the matter in hand)Â
The part in the bracket is Y .Â
And my point is that is not how you respond to arguments. I made the statement X . And if you disagree with it , you gotta respond by telling me I am wrong and backing it up with facts .Â
As for the previous arguments about me contradicting myself (according to you ) , I will explain them tomorrow when I am back from college. Got no time rnÂ
Okay udk English. Dont say "im not a native speaker" because im not either. THAT is a way to say that you're wrong. You dont have to say "you're wrong" everytime you argue, that's what kids do. Opinions arent facts. You've been calling your opinions facts the whole time. If the statements weren't interrelateable, they wouldn't have made any sense but since you're saying i did it to my convenience you're implying that they do make sense. What you're saying is that the stuff which was said in the arguments before cannot be used again. Do not deny it because that is literally what all you said means. Hence comes my question "what else should i have done". In your language, that is a "fact".
And I've not seen ANY of your statements backed up with "facts" just you calling me dumb. And refusing till you had "no time" to explain.Â
Also if you have problem with me answering your arguments in questions refer to your previous comments.Â
Know it far better than you do kid . I am glad you made a good and valid comment for the first time. I will refute it tomorrow .Â
Lmao then why havent you been using it? I've made valid points all along i literally had to type that how i explain it to kids for you. So that makes you the kid here
Your statements literally have way more errors than my statements . You haven't made any valid points . That's what you think .Â
Wow so you're grammarly now? Dude are you a shape-shifter? You literally keep changing everything. And oof again I'll have to explain in detail why i had to reply as a question. Honestly i feel like arguing with a kid
I had no intention to speak about your English. You were the one who raised that topic . And i responded to itÂ
Comprehension is directly related to knowing a language. If you dont know a language, you cant comprehend it. You brought it up since the start of this argument.
Fair enough and good point but what you say is not entirely true . Comprehension is also related to logic and reasoning. For instance when sometimes I am arguing with my mom in Assamese , she tells me I am not able to comprehend what she spoke . Does that mean she is saying I am bad at my mother tongue ? Absolutely no . What she meant is I was unable to understand the logic and the reasoning .Â
Â
So even in this case , I meant to say you weren't able to understand the logic . (Again this is subjective . And you can prove me wrong , by proving that you indeed understand it ) .Â
I guess we can end this point peacefully. The rest , we will sort it out one by one ?
Like mother like son. I've said this a million times, then EXPLAIN it but you never did and yeah this can end
"like mother like son"Â was it necessary for you to write that , when I made an attempt to settle it out peacefully ? And yeah I already said I will explain it but you keep acting like an imbecileÂ
Dude you're the one acting like that because you have the time to reply to comments but not explain anything. If you want me to stop saying that freaking explain your point already. Again calling me "imbecile" just shows how arrogant you are. Sorry if the truth hurt you
I knew you are dumb enough to not get it . I will first explain the X and Y thing .Â
X= You interrelate statements according to your convenience . (This was my statement)Â
Your response = So what ? You want me to (interrelate imaginary statements which are not even part of the matter in hand)Â
The part in the bracket is Y .Â
And my point is that is not how you respond to arguments. I made the statement X . And if you disagree with it , you gotta respond by telling me I am wrong and backing it up with facts .Â
As for the previous arguments about me contradicting myself (according to you ) , I will explain them tomorrow when I am back from college. Got no time rnÂ
Okay udk English. Dont say "im not a native speaker" because im not either. THAT is a way to say that you're wrong. You dont have to say "you're wrong" everytime you argue, that's what kids do. Opinions arent facts. You've been calling your opinions facts the whole time. If the statements weren't interrelateable, they wouldn't have made any sense but since you're saying i did it to my convenience you're implying that they do make sense. What you're saying is that the stuff which was said in the arguments before cannot be used again. Do not deny it because that is literally what all you said means. Hence comes my question "what else should i have done". In your language, that is a "fact".
And I've not seen ANY of your statements backed up with "facts" just you calling me dumb. And refusing till you had "no time" to explain.Â
Also if you have problem with me answering your arguments in questions refer to your previous comments.Â
Know it far better than you do kid . I am glad you made a good and valid comment for the first time. I will refute it tomorrow .Â
Lmao then why havent you been using it? I've made valid points all along i literally had to type that how i explain it to kids for you. So that makes you the kid here
Your statements literally have way more errors than my statements . You haven't made any valid points . That's what you think .Â
Wow so you're grammarly now? Dude are you a shape-shifter? You literally keep changing everything. And oof again I'll have to explain in detail why i had to reply as a question. Honestly i feel like arguing with a kid
I had no intention to speak about your English. You were the one who raised that topic . And i responded to itÂ
Comprehension is directly related to knowing a language. If you dont know a language, you cant comprehend it. You brought it up since the start of this argument.
Fair enough and good point but what you say is not entirely true . Comprehension is also related to logic and reasoning. For instance when sometimes I am arguing with my mom in Assamese , she tells me I am not able to comprehend what she spoke . Does that mean she is saying I am bad at my mother tongue ? Absolutely no . What she meant is I was unable to understand the logic and the reasoning .Â
Â
So even in this case , I meant to say you weren't able to understand the logic . (Again this is subjective . And you can prove me wrong , by proving that you indeed understand it ) .Â
I guess we can end this point peacefully. The rest , we will sort it out one by one ?
Like mother like son. I've said this a million times, then EXPLAIN it but you never did and yeah this can end
"like mother like son"Â was it necessary for you to write that , when I made an attempt to settle it out peacefully ? And yeah I already said I will explain it but you keep acting like an imbecile . But yeah anyways I need not get offended by such small stuffÂ