Does True Randomness Actually Exist?

Now respond to my two posts and learn something. For convenience:

1. the constellations stay basically the same over time and location (except for which subset that can be seen)
2. no news station claimed a satellite had been shot down this week

https://www.google.com/search?q=Chinese+spy+satellite+shot+down+over+Montana&oq=Chinese+spy+satellite+shot+down+over+Montana&aqs=chrome..69i57.15228j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 

I am NOT Making this stuff up! 

I thought I responded to all your posts. Which posts are you referring to? 

I listed two points.

The first was a fact to acknowledge the rigid (spherical) configuration of the stars.

The second was to accept you had made a false claim about a satellite being shot down. You posted a search which supports that you made a false claim (there are very few erroneous references to satellites in the search listing  - the first video is from some small town "news" source that is probably one part time guy and a horse). Here is the rest of your search results - the word "satellite" does not appear.

I have been saying from the get go the stars/constellations are fixed. You said there are 2 sets of stationary star systems. I asked you which stars/planets belong to which star system. 

No, I said there are two hemispheres of the sky. That is an observational fact.

The sky rotates relative to the Earth, with the North pole of the sky fixed from all locations in the Northern hemisphere, and the South pole of the sky fixed from all locations in the Southern hemisphere.

Interesting fact - to find your latitude, simply measure the angle to the pole of the sky you can see (near enough the North Pole star from the Northern hemisphere).

The north stationary star is called Polaris. What is the south stationary star called? Solaris

Here is the info from explainingscience.org:

So how many light years away is the south pole star?

So are many so-called flat earthers/geocentric scientist. But they don't believe stars are light years away. Using the new telescopic cameras like the Nikon P900/1000 they zoom right into the stars. 

That is the way mainstream shows the flat earth. Some floating disk ...Lost in Space

Obviously laughable! 

Doesn't matter for the purpose of this discussion. Like all stars, it's just a very distant object that is moving very very slowly by comparison with its distance.

Spamming white space in a thread will get you muted.  Just FYI.

Sure.  Why don't you buy one and prove us all wrong with some close-up photos of Vega?

Elroch - you say it's moving but the north star does not move. Time lapse footage shows perfect circles of stars around it. 

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nikon+p1000+stars 

Very Interesting stuff in my opinion!  

Some say they are out of focus but they look pretty clear/distinct to me. 

Those could be faked.  You need to buy your own and prove it.

It's amusing how you deny one source and then blindly accept another that is just as falsifiable.

Is not a google a 1 with 100 zeros? 

Nope.  That's a Googol.  Common mistake.