Does True Randomness Actually Exist?

It is an entirely separate thing, so yes it does

okay -- so they are making a statement about man on the moon & ISS simultaneously for the first time --------- as though it is a ------------------ "Giant Leap for Mankind" -----------------of course it has yet to transpire ---------------------- have to wait till 2027/2028 or longer!

...Is 6545 km / 4067 mi / 93.5 million Big Macs not close enough to be "to" the Moon? (No one said "on")

as far as atmospheric drag/conservation of momentum being "an entirely separate thing" --- not sure how that is separated/excluded from "rocket science" !

My point is that in order to escape blocking - he will often only ask 'talking point questions' instead of attacking all of science. His main tactic.
But whenever he does go back to that main tactic of his - then some will be likely to both ridicule his positions and also attack him personally.
It often doesn't occur to those people doing so - that when they do that then they're giving him something he's both looking for and is prepared for.
Similiar with EE - but EE doesn't attack all of science.
-------------------------
forum topic concerns randomness:
couldn't find a good randomness joke on the net just now.
why did the two dice cross the road?

When I said "an entirely separate thing" I meant it was an entirely separate thing from speeds being relative to a frame of reference.

oh - okay - so going around the moon while people are floating around in the ISS -- is the point ------- so its a first for the Guinness books !

indeed "relative" is the keyword !

I don't quite understand why they focused on that part either, but oh well.

I think what most really wants to see is --------- "man/first woman -------- walking on the moon" !

The spacecraft undergoing re-entry and thus slowing down and its speed and direction then matching the orbital speed and direction of the earth's orbit (and the earth's spinning too- at that latitude) is an example of entropy in action.
Where I'm referring to entropy as a process rather than a result or 'just a result'.
But as to whether that entropy is making things more random or less random -that depends.
'matching the speed' and getting rid of the speed differential seems to be making things less random both in the design of the action and the process and the result too.

What about randomness in everyday life?
Like in decision-making?
Boss: 'why are you late?'
'because it rained last night'.

Almost everyone has seen it. Some are oblivious that they have.

when did the first woman walk on the moon ?

You said "man/first woman"
Therefore, it didn't have to be "first woman"

okay -- you don't think countless women/men worldwide --- are more than eager to see --------------------------------- the "first woman walking on the moon"!

Never said that either

"Man walking on the moon", on the other hand, is something that has already happened

not just once - not just twice - not just thrice -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------but 6 times ----- & they were not just walking & jumping around -------------------------they were riding around in moon-buggies playing golf !!