Destroyer_Mark_1420 wrote:
No. Get off my Thread
Are you trying to prove a point in this?
Don't post on this thread
Sort:
0
#43
Men have very narrow interests in comparison to women. That is part of their genetics. It is thus true (?) that men have lesser intelligence, but nature would be seksist if that was (were?) true.
0
#44
Cubronzo wrote:
Having narrow interests is not a direct causal link to low intelligence, because a very smart person can have his own interests and know a lot in one particular domain and also because intelligence is subjective.
Men have very narrow interests in comparison to women. That is part of their genetics. It is thus true (?) that men have lesser intelligence, but nature would be seksist if that was (were?) true.
0
#46
Cubronzo wrote:
How would I know? Me is you.
You do not know the difference between intelligence and wisdom, do you David?
0
#48
Cubronzo wrote:
Big Brain does not make Genius.
You have a big brain, David. Use it.
0
#50
Morality is subjective without God. Different people can live by their own rules. There cannot be an objective standard for morality.
0
#51
Cubronzo wrote:
Yes there can be. Compassion, for example. Morality does not require the belief in a higher spiritual power.
Morality is subjective without God. Different people can live by their own rules. There cannot be an objective standard for morality.
0
#53
Cubronzo wrote:
There is empirical evidence that morality does not require belief in God. Most people who go to jail are Religious.
That is not an argument
0
#54
Cubronzo wrote:
Okay, let us take away the existence of God. What's your point?
That is not an argument
0
#55
Cubronzo wrote:
My point is that Morality cannot be logically justified as a way of living. It is irrational to be moral if you have nothing to lose from being immoral. This is because compassion is merely an evolutionary mechanism, and the impulse to disagree comes from that mechanism. Morality is faith-based.
That is not an argument
0
#56
Cubronzo wrote:
Morality is a priori
Cubronzo wrote:
My point is that Morality cannot be logically justified as a way of living. It is irrational to be moral if you have nothing to lose from being immoral. This is because compassion is merely an evolutionary mechanism, and the impulse to disagree comes from that mechanism. Morality is faith-based.
That is not an argument
0
#57
Morality is not a priori because a priori means logical. Logic requires an argument.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Then reality defines reality?