DT100: Work VS Play

Sort:
Avatar of DuckDuckChess6

The first ever DT100!

Inspired by darwinc2007, DT100 is a variant of Race to 100.

The score starts out 50-50. Every time you vote for a team, add 1 point to that team and subtract 1 point from the opposing team. For titled players, the increase/decrease is by 2 points. Whichever team gets their number to 100 first wins! And there will be trophies.

Thanks to darwinc2007 for the idea!

Now, play!

49-51

 

Avatar of RALRAL3333

48-52

Avatar of DuckDuckChess6

47-53

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

48-52

Avatar of Pashak1989

Have you ever seen a titled player take part in this stupid games?? 

Obviously not, so why tell "If a titled player posts then this will happen". 

 

Titled players actually have a life. 

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

Actually, titled players have indeed posted in these forums.

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

But in my opinion, you should not name it dt 100 as people will not know what dt is. Name it something like Race to 100: 50/50 so it is more recognizable

Avatar of DuckDuckChess6

Got it.

47-53

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

48-52

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

I am only voting for work cause no one will vote for that. Besides, I do a lot of work anyways, especially for the fact that it is summer break

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

lol, there is a lot of these games

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

but I'm still playing

Avatar of Pashak1989
stewardjandstewardj escribió:

Actually, titled players have indeed posted in these forums.

 

In forums yes. But I have never seen a titled player take part in of this "games" for 4 year olds. 

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

CM y3B4 has responded a lot in the Bishop and Knight ones. A very big factor into Knights winning as much as they did

And a game for 4 year olds? They would be bored to death cause they don't have the patience, and besides, most of them can't count to 100! XD

But seriously, Just cause you might find it stupid and boring doesn't mean it is to us. I mean, I would not do this for an hour straight. I have a life beyond counting in a range between 100-1000, trying to beat another team counting to the same number. I have other things to do. But, for me, this is one of those things that are just sort of fun to do! You only respond with one short reply, so why not? :D

Avatar of DuckDuckChess6

47-53

Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

48-52

Avatar of Pashak1989
stewardjandstewardj escribió:

CM y3B4 has responded a lot in the Bishop and Knight ones. A very big factor into Knights winning as much as they did

And a game for 4 year olds? They would be bored to death cause they don't have the patience, and besides, most of them can't count to 100! XD

But seriously, Just cause you might find it stupid and boring doesn't mean it is to us. I mean, I would not do this for an hour straight. I have a life beyond counting in a range between 100-1000, trying to beat another team counting to the same number. I have other things to do. But, for me, this is one of those things that are just sort of fun to do! You only respond with one short reply, so why not? :D

 

So you seriously consider that there is nothing wrong with this kind of games? 

 

 

Avatar of MasterOfLOLs
Pashak1989 wrote:

Have you ever seen a titled player take part in this stupid games?? 

Obviously not, so why tell "If a titled player posts then this will happen". 

 

Titled players actually have a life. 

You are not one, so you don't have a life!

Avatar of MasterOfLOLs
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of TheGElCOgecko

pashak, there is probably something you do in real life similar to this. I don't mean the structure of the game play, but the idea that you are sacrificing anywhere from a couple of seconds to a couple of minutes of your time to do something that does not influence your life once so ever, and yet is just for a slight entertainment.

What I see wrong is how you are being so negative.

Avatar of Guest6193772076
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.