Yeah, that topic is against TOS, of course.
For the record

This thread is obsolete now that the person in question has fled the scene of the crime. Posters that bump this will be blocked. Stir up trouble elsewhere...

Oh dear... Contradicting yourself again... Its tough on the rest of us know which rules you are imposing on which day... Are you Putin in disguise? :)

Oh dear... Contradicting yourself again... Its tough on the rest of us know which rules you are imposing on which day... Are you Putin in disguise? :)
I'm not even sure if you are talking to me here, but if you are, it's a little scattered. There's no contradiction, and the Putin reference...ummm...nope, I can't make it fit unless I just assume you dislike Putin and wanted a flimsy excuse to make a political post.
This thread:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/help-support/ronaldjosephcote-and-btickler-attacked-my-grandchildren?page=1
...would seem to imply that I have attacked a poster's grandchildren in the forums and that some kind of action has been taken...being blocked from responding also makes it look like I have no defense or I have been muted.
Not a single one of these are true. It's about time chess.com implemented a policy about posters naming and shaming people for non-chess related issues while blocking them from defending themselves. When a poster is told by the mods that there's been no actionable misconduct, then that should be the end of it.