Hot Take: Animation is better than live-action.
Sort:
May 25, 2025
0
#22
All the good movie writers are employed by some company, so while spending more on writers might make more good ideas come out of one company because they have all the good writers, I honestly don’t care which company it is as long as they don’t wokeify it. And given the lack of good stories I don’t think there are tons of really good unemployed writers out there that companies just can’t hire because they’re spending too much on cgi.
May 25, 2025
0
#23
I partially agree. Some live actions are better than the animation, and vice versa
Live action is better when it's plausible, but I prefer animation when its not something that could actually happen in real life like most fantasy stuff
May 25, 2025
0
#25
Ultrawolf259 wrote:
Live action is better when it's plausible, but I prefer animation when its not something that could actually happen in real life like most fantasy stuff
That's exactly my opinion but I prefer animation over live action almost always.
May 25, 2025
0
#26
Well…ya, animating allows you to do so much more than you could do with live action
May 25, 2025
0
#27
SOUNDWAVE_SUPERIOR21 wrote:
Animation just allows you to have unique styles, expressive characters and better scenes than live-action. I watch movies and shows to escape reality and I feel that live-action is just reality with some story and a bit of CGI. I'm not saying that animation necessarily has better stories than live-action, as the story depends on whoever is writing it.
I gotta agree. One example of animation>live action is the spider verse movies and I’ll die on that hill
May 25, 2025
0
#28
However, both have their place. For a movie like saw, for example, you watch it for the bloody realism, not for animation. You can’t capture the same saw animated
they can hire better writers but, you do make a fair point there.