How universe had came from nothing

Sort:
Coax_the_keg

👏🤦

antisunechess

Shh we don't talk about the birth of the universe on chess.com

antisunechess

just kidding

Coax_the_keg

Lol

IdaBPeterson

Migliori Batteria Di Pentole Recensioni e guida all’acquisto 2020
https://batteriadipentole.com/
https://batteriadipentole.com/padelle-antiaderenti/

Shona_babyy

hello happy.png

Coax_the_keg

Lol hi guys 

Coax_the_keg
IdaBPeterson wrote:

Migliori Batteria Di Pentole Recensioni e guida all’acquisto 2020
https://batteriadipentole.com/
https://batteriadipentole.com/padelle-antiaderenti/

Can you translate in English

Coax_the_keg

Haha 

Coax_the_keg

Every time I post people always start everything that is not I used to ask? Why guysss

Coax_the_keg

I like you bro but woollen banned me that was a bit sad to me!!

DavidNorman435
God. Not nothing. You've seen explosions on TV or in comics, and explosions don't create, they destroy. So how do you expect an explosion in the middle of NOTHING to CREATE. It makes no sense. Also, the explosion happened in NOTHING, and if there is nothing, there is no cause, so no explosion.
Tja_05

DavidNorman435 wrote:

God. Not nothing. You've seen explosions on TV or in comics, and explosions don't create, they destroy. So how do you expect an explosion in the middle of NOTHING to CREATE. It makes no sense. Also, the explosion happened in NOTHING, and if there is nothing, there is no cause, so no explosion.

The creation story dosen't make sense no matter how you look at it.

llamonade2
DavidNorman435 wrote:
God. Not nothing. You've seen explosions on TV or in comics, and explosions don't create, they destroy. So how do you expect an explosion in the middle of NOTHING to CREATE. It makes no sense. Also, the explosion happened in NOTHING, and if there is nothing, there is no cause, so no explosion.

It just adds more questions, because now you have to ask "What created God?"

If you say "nothing created God, it always existed" then Occam's razor says to cut out the middle man, just say the universe always existed and there's no need for an anthropomorphic God (that anthropomorphism should itself stir incredulity).

Moreover, read any religious text as if it's written by a human, with its linguistic and cultural influences and limitations, and look at the history of any religion and it's painfully obvious you're studying something wholly mundane.

People don't believe because it makes sense, or because it's right, most often they believe because they were lied to when they were too young to think for themselves. As adults they continue to believe because it's an easy way to not think about difficult questions. In short they believe because it feels nice.

"The big bang can't create because it's an explosion"

You must be 12 years old to make an argument like that lol. First of all it wasn't an "explosion." Secondly no one says the big bang is definitely true. Thirdly scientists don't believe things because they feel nice, instead they follow the evidence. They don't say something is true, they say something is supported. That support is the difference between having fantasy and having knowledge.

DavidNorman435
Take evolution, there is no visual proof that humans ever were evolved from monkeys.

If the big bang wasn't an explosion, then what was it. Plus, there is no physical evidence that it ever existed.


And to talk about why people believe things, people don't have to be told something in order to believe it. For instance, people are being converted to many other religions, and especially those who have never heard of them before.


If something is mundane, does it mean that it isn't true?


The Gospel doesn't say that the universe always existed, it says that there is God, who CREATED ("CREATED" being the keyword there) the universe about 17 K years ago. And God always existed, it never was created. If you look from a Christian standpoint, if you ask "Who/What created God, then you must admit, that by asking that, you are saying that the universe would've never existed.
llamonade2
DavidNorman435 wrote:
Take evolution, there is no visual proof that humans ever were evolved from monkeys.

Let me stop you right there, no one says humans evolved from monkeys.

Either you're trolling or your religious group has lied to you.

Instead of posting nonsense online try to learn a little about what you're disagreeing with first.

DavidNorman435
That's false, and obviously, you have been hidden from many scientific museums!

Most museums have sections entirely devoted to the study of evolution! Also, some scientists claim it to be real (false info).
DavidNorman435
And i have studied evolution, and i am not trolling.
llamonade2

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/cat02.html

 

First question, first sentence:

1. Did we evolve from monkeys?

Humans did not evolve from monkeys.

llamonade2
DavidNorman435 wrote:
And i have studied evolution, and i am not trolling.

Either way it doesn't matter to me, because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.