I wrote something so complex I no longer understand it
Sort:
Cubronzo_old
Mar 25, 2017
0
#1
Where the arrow represents forward motion, the block moves accordingly. The parodox of this, however, is that whether or not the block moves because of the direction of the arrow, or the arrow points because of the motion of the block? They both act simultaneously, and thus the question as to which one caused the action is made relevant. Here's where it gets tricky. In order for the block to move, the arrow must be pointing right, and in order for the arrow to point right, the block must move in that direction. This brings up the question; what caused the action to impede in the first place. The answer to this question is actually very simple; both happen spontaneously and thus their interdependence is no longer relevant. The block and the arrow must be set in motion at the same time. The arrow points right because the block came into existence at the exact same time that the arrow did, and the block moves right because it came into being at exactly the same time the arrow did.
What you wrote here is an advanced paper explaining concepts of morality and panentheism and even some of the paradoxes regarding the deep nature of reality. You may not have known it even as it was being written, but this is basically Panentheism.
Mar 25, 2017
0
#4
How would the block move? Because the arrow is pointing right. But, what causes the arrow to point right? The motion of the block? The block can only move if the arrow points right. I just wrote a big piece of crap.
