The humanzee (Homo sapiens sapiens x Pan troglodytes) (also known as the Chuman or Manpanzee) is a hypothetical chimpanzee/human hybrid. Chimpanzees and humans are closely related (sharing 95% of their DNA sequence and 99% of coding DNA sequences[1]), leading to contested speculation that a hybrid is possible. However, such a human-animal hybrid has not actually existed outside of fictional works that have explored the concept.
If evolution was true this should happen human having offspring from a champanzee but it is impossible; in the bible its very clear everything according to its kind, that mean for the simpletons that only human can have human babies and chimpanzee will have chimpanzee offspring, very simple. That is why I not a evolutionist, because the bible prove evolution to be faults. Otherwise if evolution was true animal and human can breed and can have offspring proving the theory of evolution true and you will see there was no difference from animals, apes and humans. A little thing God saying lets make man in our image, means we are divine and not animals. So alex like always you are wrong, even two percent in a DNA make a big difference distinguishing from humans to chimpanzee.
....
58 minutes ago · Quote · #1438
alex-rodriguez wrote:
yureesystem
Since you are incapable of understanding science and since you don't even know what science is, and since you think magic is how the world works, why should anyone ever explain anything to you? It would be like explaining science to a dog.
Assembled from 3-D scans of individual fossils, a life-size rendering of H. naledi's hand displays curved fingers, a clue that the species had retained an ability to climb in trees and on rocks. The thumb, wrist, and palm bones all look remarkably modern.
I really try with you, I hope that tiny brain of your can gain a grain of truth but you incapable of learning and comprehending true science. Just looking at photo these are apes hand and feet; the bone struction indicates some sort of ape; you know evolutionist lie a lot, this would not be the first time with National Geographic, there was a article way back they found bird type dinosaur and had a glue dinosaur tail to the bird, it turn out to be fake. So you can see I don't trust National Geographic lie once, I won't you any more. But a simpleton like you, you believe anything concerning evolution.
You see the difference from a human hand.