Is evolution true?

Sort:
Avatar of Thebackwardpawn
davikitty07 wrote:
By the way...........


The simplest protein is ribonuclease. It has many amino acids. And different kinds of amino acids. Amino acids can only operate correctly if it is arranged in just the right way. If it's just ONE amino acid off, it won't work properly. Remember that ribonuclease is THE SIMPLEST protein. So how could and explosion go off, and then make thousands of ribonuclease that are just right???

Also, explosions DESTROY things, not MAKE them.

 

Thanks- this is very instructive.  It's as instructive as the time you posted the same thing at #100 and when you posted it before that at #88.  And apparently you like to randomly post the same thing on other threads like the screenshot below...I even defended your statement in part, but this tells me you're not even reading people's responses.  So I will change mine: Ribonuclease which is about 124 amino acids long is NOT the simplest protein, Trp-cage with 20 amino acids is.  It's possible to substitute and change the order of amino acids in proteins and for them to still be functional; no one said, thinks or believes that proteins were formed from an explosion; AND remember ribonuclease is NOT the simplest protein....And one last thing- please stop spamming.

null

Avatar of Hihowrudoing
davikitty07 wrote:
By the way...........


The simplest protein is ribonuclease. It has many amino acids. And different kinds of amino acids. Amino acids can only operate correctly if it is arranged in just the right way. If it's just ONE amino acid off, it won't work properly. Remember that ribonuclease is THE SIMPLEST protein. So how could and explosion go off, and then make thousands of ribonuclease that are just right???

Also, explosions DESTROY things, not MAKE them.

You are so right

Avatar of varelse1

Today even birds are now classified as dinosaurs, being their direct descendants.

Avatar of Fifthelement
varelse1 wrote:
Fifthelement wrote:
varelse1 wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:

Reasonable person:  “When the bible says rib it means rib.“

 

Creationist: “When the bible says rib it means stem cell.”

Creationist: "When the Bible says seven days, it means seven days."

Reasonable person: "When the Bible says seven days, it means 13 billion years."

There is refutation about fossill/geology  dating according to religion.

There are many attempts to "discredit.".

I havent been presented with anything yet, that could be called "refutation."

And certainly, no evidence whatsoever, to support a 6000 year-old universe.

You should find the jews ancient text about anomaly in rotten meat.It was said that before those time the meat is not easy to be rotten.But after those time the meat start easily to be rotten.

Probably it was related to the nature laws change.

It seems not easy to find 2000-1000 BC news.

Avatar of varelse1
Fifthelement wrote:
 

You should find the jews ancient text about anomaly in rotten meat.It was said that before those time the meat is not easy to be rotten.But after those time the meat start easily to be rotten.

Probably it was related to the nature laws change.

It seems not easy to find 2000-1000 BC news.

So here we are, looking for a reason to believe in Creationism, despite all the evidence against it.

And you offer us rotting meat.....Undecided

Okay then. 

Don't sweat it. I am sure you tried your best.

Avatar of JustOneUSer
#223

Okay he's trolling he ignores every comment that disagrees with that and doesn't offer an alternative to what they say.

We can ignore him safety.
Avatar of JustOneUSer
#221

They believe in a 6000 year old inhabitable earth, the earth itself and universe don't have an existing biblical date.

But the earth being 6000 is quite ludicrous none the less,IMHO.
Avatar of varelse1
VicountVonJames wrote:
#221

They believe in a 6000 year old inhabitable earth, the earth itself and universe don't have an existing biblical date.

But the earth being 6000 is quite ludicrous none the less,IMHO.

Maybe they mean 6000 METRIC years?

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

It does not say in the Bible ever that the Earth is 6,000 years old

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

???

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

Why do you say that?

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

2018 A.D. THERE WAS SOMETHING CALLED B.C.

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

Some people are just weird...

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

That would make sense

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

What is your picture of?

Avatar of varelse1
Destroyer_Mark_1420 wrote:
The Earth is 2018 years old guys.

Yes it does.

You just have to squint really hard, to see it.

Avatar of varelse1

First Dinosaur Tail Found Preserved in Amber

 

 

 

The tail of a 99-million-year-old dinosaur, including bones, soft tissue, and even feathers, has been found preserved in amber, according to a report published today in the journal Current Biology.

 

 

 

While individual dinosaur-era feathers have been found in amber, and evidence for feathered dinosaurs is captured in fossil impressions, this is the first time that scientists are able to clearly associate well-preserved feathers with a dinosaur, and in turn gain a better understanding of the evolution and structure of dinosaur feathers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feathered_dinosaur

Avatar of Hihowrudoing

A God could have created feathered dinosaurs

Avatar of varelse1
Hihowrudoing wrote:

A God could have created feathered dinosaurs

That is true.

In fact, there is nothing in Evolution, or Universal Common Descent, that is beyond Gods ability to achieve.

Which makes me wonder why so many reject these theories on emotional grounds, as threats to their chosen faiths?

As if "If Evolution is true, I can never believe in Allah/Buddha/God again!!"

There's simply no threat here. What's the problem?

Avatar of varelse1
Hihowrudoing wrote:

A God could have created feathered dinosaurs

But in any event, the point is, Darwin promised us we would find such evidence one day. And we did.

And more importantly, Evolution Deniers spent the last 150 years stomping their feet, promising us we would never find any such remains. Because there were none to be found. Because Evolution is false.

And, as has happened so many times in the past, they broke that promise.

(Surprise, surprise, right?)

Just as they broke that promise, with every transitional fossil that has been discovered, since the dawn of paleontology.

How many such promises must they break, before we begin to notice a pattern?

This forum topic has been locked