Is it possible to prove anything?

It's a secret.

then u didn't prove it

First I have to ask you what constitutes a proof to you before I provide it. Otherwise you will troll me.

proof |proōf|noun1 evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or thetruth of a statement

That's only an abstract definition of what proof means.

See, it's not really about proof, it's about trust.

If you don't trust me, you ask for proof.

People who don't trust in the process of creation, are obligated to provide scientific proof that their nutty theories have a basis, and that proof is usually even more banana-faced than the theory itself.

THERE ISNT SUCK THING AS SCIENTIFIC PROOF

and by the way i just showed u that u didn't prove that your favorite number is 7. If u say your favorite number is 7, how do we know that u are not just lying?

i would like to point out that the archaic meaning of "prove" is "to test".It is preserved in such expressions as "the exception that proves the rule","the proof of the pudding is in the eating","to prove ground(military)",etc.

One cannot prove anything, but one can prove something.

clueless

Squarely wrote:

One cannot prove anything, but one can prove something.

Correct. We can prove things exactly in the maths. We can prove things , with great precision, in the sciences. As to my favorite number, I can establish that exactly by fiat, if others don't choose to believe me, so what? They don't get a vote.

SCIENCE CANT PROVE ITSELF,A COUNTER EXAMPLE CAN COME ALONG AND CONTRADICT THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY

Science is science only if it is falsifiable and that is why a priori knowledge (philosophy, maths) does not count as science.

dah

well, science can be a means to any subject

What?

its true, it says so in my science textbook

I don't really understand what are you saying.

im saying since science can be a means to any subject, and science cant be proven, then nothing can be proven

Maths and philosophy are not science even if your textbook says differently.