@checkmateohwait, can you block this guy?
Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack.
Ive played it quite a few times OTB and even with the arbiter watching, nothing happened.
Was the arbiter FIDE-approved? If not, that explains it.

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
The equivalent of pawn-cheaters.

The OFFICIAL CHESS.COM article about En Passant:
https://www.chess.com/article/view/how-to-capture-en-passant

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.

But, if only 2 people said that en passant is a rule, then en passant isn't a rule, but in this case, majority of chess players agree that en passant is a rule

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
Key word: EVERYONE

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
I can't buddy, you blocked me

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
I can't buddy, you blocked me
Of course! I block trolls the moment I meet them. But can you not still read my forum?

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
Key word: EVERYONE
Problem is, not everybody has agreed upon on peasant as a rule.

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
I can't buddy, you blocked me
Of course! I block trolls the moment I meet them. But can you not still read my forum?
Your definition of a troll is a person that doesn't agree with you and instead agrees with facts?

Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack.
Can you stop pulling out facts out of the top of your head? I'm in awe of your creativity, but it's getting irritating