Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.

Sort:
ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

 

Can you stop pulling out facts out of the top of your head? I'm in awe of your creativity, but it's getting irritating

 

ZoomorBoom

@checkmateohwait, can you block this guy?

st0ckfish
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

2Ke21-0
checkmateohwait wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

Ive played it quite a few times OTB and even with the arbiter watching, nothing happened.

Was the arbiter FIDE-approved? If not, that explains it. 

2Ke21-0
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

The equivalent of pawn-cheaters. 

ChessSensasian

The OFFICIAL CHESS.COM article about En Passant:

https://www.chess.com/article/view/how-to-capture-en-passant

 

ZoomorBoom
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

ZoomorBoom

But, if only 2 people said that en passant is a rule, then en passant isn't a rule, but in this case, majority of chess players agree that en passant is a rule

ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

ChessSensasian

Chess.com says that it is an official move. So for all we know, it is legal.

2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move. 

ZoomorBoom
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

Key word: EVERYONE

 

ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move. 

 

I can't buddy, you blocked me

 

2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move. 

 

I can't buddy, you blocked me

 

Of course! I block trolls the moment I meet them. But can you not still read my forum? 

ChessSensasian
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move. 

Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.

And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move

2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

Key word: EVERYONE

 

Problem is, not everybody has agreed upon on peasant as a rule. 

ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move. 

 

I can't buddy, you blocked me

 

Of course! I block trolls the moment I meet them. But can you not still read my forum? 

 

Your definition of a troll is a person that doesn't agree with you and instead agrees with facts?

 

2Ke21-0
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!

 

If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually

 

What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal. 

 

Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal

 

You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move. 

Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.

And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move

Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules? 

2Ke21-0

What facts? You mean lies, right?